Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:40:58
Server time: 06:19:01, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | luthorian3059 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: For et mer rettferdig Kazulia (del 17)

Details

Submitted by[?]: De venstregrønne

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3471

Description[?]:

Some policies to move Kazulia in a more just and equitable direction.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:24:13, April 06, 2013 CET
FromUnionen av Frihet
ToDebating the For et mer rettferdig Kazulia (del 17)
MessageNo.

Date11:42:27, April 07, 2013 CET
FromDe venstregrønne
ToDebating the For et mer rettferdig Kazulia (del 17)
MessageKazulia is one of the few countries without a high-quality, publicly-funded broadcaster. We fail to understand why any party would oppose this bill.

Date16:10:08, April 07, 2013 CET
FromKløverpartiet
ToDebating the For et mer rettferdig Kazulia (del 17)
MessageWe agree.

Date22:08:19, April 07, 2013 CET
FromUnionen av Frihet
ToDebating the For et mer rettferdig Kazulia (del 17)
MessageIts not that public media is evil, its just unneccessary. The government shouldn't exist to operate media stations. How about instead of increasing our spending on this stuff we lower taxes?

Date05:27:48, April 08, 2013 CET
FromDe venstregrønne
ToDebating the For et mer rettferdig Kazulia (del 17)
MessageWhy should government not operate media if it can provide a better, more informative service with high-quality programming that meets the needs of all sections of society, as opposed to simply making a profit for some private company?

Date01:16:48, April 09, 2013 CET
FromLogisk Synspunkt
ToDebating the For et mer rettferdig Kazulia (del 17)
MessageWhere does the government get the money? By taking it from people. Where does the private company get the money? From other companies that wish to advertise their product. Which method is more morally sound? The second, end of discussion.

Date12:53:26, April 09, 2013 CET
FromLiberal Konservative Partiet
ToDebating the For et mer rettferdig Kazulia (del 17)
MessageMorality of where the money comes from should not mean a sacrifice of the quality and enjoyability of watching TV or listening to radio. Before privatisation, the Kazulian Broadcasting Corporation was able to be advertisement free and provided extremely high quality programming. These days people are fed up of their programmes being interrupted by advert breaks and programmes that have been devised simply to win a ratings war.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 105

no
   

Total Seats: 91

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Cultural Protocol bills must provide a real-life equivalent or short description for the ethnic groups, languages and religions contained in them, such that it would be easy for an unfamiliar player to understand (e.g. "Dundorfian = German"). Where appropriate, they should also provide guidance to players on where to find help with translations and character names. This might include, for example, links to Google Translate, Behind the Name's Random Name Generator and Fantasy Name Generators.

    Random quote: "Don't listen to what the Communists say, but look at what they do." - Nguyen Van Thieu

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 73