Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5480
Next month in: 02:51:23
Server time: 17:08:36, May 07, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): henryT | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Religous regulation bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hobrazian Peoples Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2158

Description[?]:

This is a proposal to regulate things concerning religion. Hope we can get a discussion on our religious ideoligies. The HPP thinks that religions shall exist freely, but monitored by a political government, not controlled, but monitored.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:58:42, December 15, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageWe feel that religions should be regulated like ordinary companies or charities.

Date21:59:28, December 15, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageWe feel that religions should be regulated like ordinary companies or charities.

Date23:03:15, December 15, 2005 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageWe are not to concerned about article 1 as we feel there should be no direct link between Government and religion, however we believe that religions should be treated as any other company and so support article 2.

Date23:10:21, December 15, 2005 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageThis is not to propose a direct link or any kind of manipulation of religions, it is solely to secure the registration of preaching ministers, so that the government have easier and quicker possibilities to find offender when concerning to extremist and terrorist nature. Also any other company is registered by directors, executives etc. so why not religions.

Date23:40:25, December 15, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageWe don't have laws against people spreading extreme views. Terrorism is a different matter and we believe that our current security checks are enough; why should missionaries be treated differently to other visitors.

Date23:48:09, December 15, 2005 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageBecuase these people talks to masses. Many people listen to them and thereby we open our society for extreme thoughts, this needs registration, not control or manipulation! If their thoughts and teaching is in no manner dangerous to our nation (in any terrorising nature) they can truly continue their work with no fear. This is just a precaution.

Date23:52:59, December 15, 2005 CET
FromNational Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageNo and no. The government should leave religion alone.

Date00:15:55, December 16, 2005 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageI have stepped the proposal down.

Date00:16:09, December 16, 2005 CET
FromHobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageOr at least some of it

Date00:25:56, December 16, 2005 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Religous regulation bill
MessageAnd so we support.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 196

no
    

Total Seats: 204

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots.

    Random quote: "Every month we do not have an economic recovery package, 500 million Americans lose their jobs." - Nancy Pelosi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 66