We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Labour Security Act of 3473
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3476
Description[?]:
| A bill to make Labour Security a State Policy |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Collective bargaining
Old value:: No employees may engage in collective bargaining
Current: Public and private sector employees have the right to collectively bargain
Proposed: Public and private sector employees have the right to collectively bargain
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards daily working hours.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning daily working hours.
Current: The government obligates trade unions and employers to negotiate the daily number of working hours.
Proposed: The government obligates trade unions and employers to negotiate the daily number of working hours.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:09:30, April 22, 2013 CET | From | Imperial East Terra Company | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | This Act isn't about Labour Security - that can only be achieved by economic stability which is impossible under the Socialists' regime. This is entirely about giving excessive powers to the Union cronies of the DSP. |
| Date | 12:31:58, April 22, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | And voting against is giving excessive powers to Companies... |
| Date | 16:40:59, April 22, 2013 CET | From | Imperial East Terra Company | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | The difference between Corporations and Trade Unions though, is that Corporations create jobs and wealth while Trade Unions seek ever more burdensomeand impractical demands. |
| Date | 23:28:38, April 22, 2013 CET | From | Federalist Party | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | Article 1 the FP can support |
| Date | 01:49:41, April 23, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | IETC, the important thing is where wealth create by Corporations go? |
| Date | 01:49:53, April 23, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | Article 2 FP? |
| Date | 04:29:27, April 23, 2013 CET | From | Gaduridan National Congress | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | The CRPP can support Article 1 |
| Date | 05:12:18, April 23, 2013 CET | From | Federalist Party | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | We do not like the language of article 2, as we believe the government should not obligate negotiations. We would be willing to accept local governments deciding their own policy (if it allows us) |
| Date | 07:17:14, April 23, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Labour Security Act of 3473 |
| Message | I also don't like how article 2 is written. But it's the only choice that makes Unions and Companies discuss working ours instead of being decided solely by the State or by Companies. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 340 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 78 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 112 |
| Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "God has cared for these trees, saved them from drought, disease, avalanches, and a thousand tempests and floods. But he cannot save them from fools." - John Muir |