We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: civil rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Independent Alternative
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2158
Description[?]:
| All consenting adults must have the right to choose the partner they want. Incest will remain illegal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Current: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Proposed: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:05:30, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Friedrich Hayek Party | To | Debating the civil rights |
| Message | We support |
| Date | 11:15:19, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Pnték Prsakij Prta (Phalangists) | To | Debating the civil rights |
| Message | How disgusting. Gyas can have gay partners if they want, but why marriage? Marriage should be before the eyes of God, and between one man and one women. Marriage is there to create families, homosexuals cannot do this. And the wording of this bill is very poor. It does not prevent either polygamous or incesteous marriages, therefore the Phalanx shall oppose. |
| Date | 11:53:35, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Independent Alternative | To | Debating the civil rights |
| Message | Incest would still be illegal. |
| Date | 12:48:22, December 16, 2005 CET | From | Pnték Prsakij Prta (Phalangists) | To | Debating the civil rights |
| Message | Why? And where does it say this? |
| Date | 02:23:48, December 19, 2005 CET | From | Independent Alternative | To | Debating the civil rights |
| Message | It says so in the bill description. |
| Date | 05:29:18, December 19, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the civil rights |
| Message | Explain to me how a gay couple cannot have a family??? Further more explain to me how marriage is there to create families?? The rate of divorce these days its phenomonal, some 1 in 3 couple get divorced.. doesnt sound like the family theory is working there. This bill doesnt allow them to be married "in the eyes of god" it only allows for civil marriage, providing them for entitlments under our law. Not passing this bill would be scene as legislative gay bashing.. and I wont be apart of it. We vote in favour of equal rights for all.. we vote for this very important piece of legislation. |
| Date | 08:52:01, December 19, 2005 CET | From | Pnték Prsakij Prta (Phalangists) | To | Debating the civil rights |
| Message | naturally the family theory isn't working if people like you are actively trying to break it up, and you do the biology, two men producing a baby together? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 47 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 39 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures. |
| Random quote: "If homosexuality is a disease, let's all call in queer to work. 'Hello. Can't work today; still queer.'" - Robin Tyler |