Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:06:08
Server time: 19:53:51, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: General Reforming Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party/Church of Kalistan

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2158

Description[?]:

New Reforms

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:23:06, December 16, 2005 CET
FromRevolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
ToDebating the General Reforming Act
MessageWe will support without 6 or 7. 6 is a violation of individual rights, 7 is unneeded. There are already prayers in religious schools, prayers in a non-religious school is like a vegetarian at the table when all that is being served is meat with no side dishes.

Date22:00:37, December 16, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the General Reforming Act
MessageI'll get rid of Article 7, but I want Article 6. We will allow Nudist Colonies and Beaches, but someone walking down to the grocery store with no clothe on is just wrong. We need to espercially be concerned about males doing this, for a certain reason.

Date22:19:36, December 16, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the General Reforming Act
MessageI took away some proposals, and added a lot of new Articles. Review the new ones and get back to me.

Date03:22:06, December 17, 2005 CET
FromRevolutionary Freedom Party -- KEG SLAM
ToDebating the General Reforming Act
MessageOkay, what I don't like about article 1 is that it punishes people for having children.

I'd prefer article 6 out, but if need be, it stays

For article 9 (as it is now) can we add a rider that says that while some clothing must be worn, the government cannot in any way say what that clothing must be. I don't want it turning into requiring veils and burkas.

Everything else, including article 9 with the addition that I just put in, I either support, can support, or can live with in the spirit of compromise.

Date06:16:21, December 17, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the General Reforming Act
MessageI'm afraid said Option is not avaibable for Article 9.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 73

no
  

Total Seats: 46

abstain
    

Total Seats: 94


Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated.

Random quote: "Politics, when it is an art and a service, not an exploitation, is about acting for an ideal through realities." - Charles De Gaulle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 101