Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5475
Next month in: 00:22:49
Server time: 11:37:10, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): GLNBei | Probax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Defence Act of 3489

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partit Qawmien Soċjalista Maġatrani

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3489

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:14:29, May 23, 2013 CET
From The Liberal Pinks
ToDebating the National Defence Act of 3489
MessageWhile LW supports gun rights and thinks the current laws are far to strict, forcing people to do this is just as extreme and reckless.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 171

no
  

Total Seats: 579

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "It is double pleasure to deceive the deceiver." - Niccolo Machiavelli

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 42