We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Increased Military Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Clenton Von Clausner Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3495
Description[?]:
| We, propose the spending of more in finances toward our military.Open homosexuality in the military should be banned. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:54:10, June 02, 2013 CET | From | Clenton Von Clausner Party | To | Debating the Increased Military Bill |
| Message | I propose that open homosexuality towards the non-gay men and women in colors be non tolerated.It is not only to jmuch stress and pressure on our troops but also is a sin in my eyes and is a disgust.At least make it non-opened.Think about it for a minute.Having people next to each other gay and sleeping in the same barracks with one another.Its not right for a man to be with a man with a man and vice versa with woman.You know this to be right. |
| Date | 23:59:20, June 02, 2013 CET | From | Clenton Von Clausner Party | To | Debating the Increased Military Bill |
| Message | Finances(my definition):The act of taking a full account and knowledge of what is really occuring in a state or place.To pay more attecntion or concerning a certain thing. |
| Date | 00:00:57, June 03, 2013 CET | From | Clenton Von Clausner Party | To | Debating the Increased Military Bill |
| Message | God made men to be with a woman and a woman with a man.Do you sleep with another man or woman?Why should we allow it here.Please trust me on this.It is right, |
| Date | 03:42:36, June 03, 2013 CET | From | Kaiserliche Nationale Partei | To | Debating the Increased Military Bill |
| Message | What two people consentually agree to do in the bedroom is of no concern to the state. It serves the state no purpose to limit male entry into the military based on such subjective reasoning as sexuality. Besides, historically speaking, male lovers are some of the best fighters one can field: people tend to fight at their best if their loved ones are in danger. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Band_of_Thebes) We do, however, agree on the increased spending. |
| Date | 14:48:46, June 03, 2013 CET | From | Clenton Von Clausner Party | To | Debating the Increased Military Bill |
| Message | Sie wollen Menschen machen mich zu werfen. |
| Date | 14:49:36, June 03, 2013 CET | From | Clenton Von Clausner Party | To | Debating the Increased Military Bill |
| Message | Could I make a bill on increased military spending then? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 550 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Erotic politicians, that's what we are. We're interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos and activity that appears to have no meaning." Jim Morrison |