We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Treaty Withdrawal
Details
Submitted by[?]: 姬恩黨 (Jien Faction) 🌄
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3508
Description[?]:
| Due to Mordusia violating international law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Mordusian Neutrality Pact.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:02:03, June 30, 2013 CET | From | United Mordusia Coalition (IP) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | Right and Honorable members of this Legislature, I am here today to express my deepest sorrow for the mis-communication in the meaning of The Mordusian Neutrality Pact. SEE: http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=406 . The pact does not prohibit us from allocating fund to our allies. While we promise to remain neutral in all wars the meaning of the word was intended to keep us not directly involved. Yes we supplied funds and other allocations to Zardugal, this is because the war in Zardugal is one over democracy. Should Zardugal be conquered by Deltaria, they would be ruled by a Czar. We aid democracy,not Zardugal. Please, hear my cry, and let your no vote on this withdrawl represent a brighter future between our two great nations. -Chancellor Gerald Nixon |
| Date | 05:05:20, July 01, 2013 CET | From | 姬恩黨 (Jien Faction) 🌄 | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal |
| Message | Your Excellency, We interpret article I as barring Mordusia to involving itself in any way in any war. Mordusia has clearly violated the treaty by providing funding and arms to Zardugal. The Zardic side has frequently chosen to disregard international law, while the Deltarian side has consistently upholding it. This war is not about democracy. I love democracy and I love sovereignty. Deltaria was threatened by Zardugal as a result of Zardugal breaking the Lake Majatra Governance Treaty. This war is a war about self defense against Zardic imperialism. Deltaria wants nothing to do with Zardugal and its form of government. If you did not notice, the Deltarian side consistently tried to sue for peace with reasonable terms, while Zardugal rejected everything reasonable, building up allies to kill more Deltarian troops. No doubt, Zardugal views this war as not only an act to expand their influence, but to destroy the cultures of all the nations of Terra. I urge Mordusia to rescind all funding and arms to Zardugal so that we may all re-ratify the Neutrality Agreement. Peace is of utmost importance. It saddens me that Mordusia has chosen war. Ma Zhi Grand Preceptor |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 200 | |
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who deliberately attempt to present a misleading picture of the nation's current RP laws will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |