We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: IMPORTANT: Conseil Constitutionnel (Supreme Court of Rildanor)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Parti Nationaliste 🌞
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3974
Description[?]:
| The Supreme Court is hereby created to uphold the Constitution and Treaties attached to it. Should any law or action be challenged for sake of being in violation of the Rildanorienne Constitution and or Treaties it is to adhere to, the Supreme Court shall have the power to overturn them. With reasonable doubt of constitutionality, anyone may petition to have something reviewed, or with a legislative vote of 40% or with an executive order. New Justices will be decided every ten years to be posted in comments. 10 years is one term, they may serve more than one term. 7 Justices shall be decided every 10 years and 7 chosen every 20 year. A Chief Justice is also picked by the Premier Ministre's party every 10 years and can be a present or former Associate Justice. (Nominations by parties should be proportional to the number of seats the party has held in the Assembly). All nominations must be passed through the legislature. All judges must be partisan and the judges shall be vote with their party. IF a party is extinct, its judges shall cast their vote using a randomizer (ex: http://www.random.org/coins/ ). If a party has a monopoly on the Judges (especially prevelant in a one party state) a randomizer shall be used to decide all justices vote. In this event, heads shall be in favour of keeping the bill (dissmissing the charges) and tails shall be in against the bill (upholding the charges). Decisions of each justice must be shown as images i.e. the result of the toss coin. This executive act was signed on November 30, 3508 by the High King Philippe II |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to appeal against a judgement rendered by a court.
Old value:: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Current: Every person has the right to appeal against a judgement and to have it reviewed by a higher court.
Proposed: Every person has the right to appeal to the Minister of Justice to have a judgement reviewed by another court.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Current: There is a uniform system of courts across the nation.
Proposed: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:49:12, July 02, 2013 CET | From |  Parti Nationaliste 🌞 | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Conseil Constitutionnel (Supreme Court of Rildanor) |
| Message | The High King Philippe II has chosen the Supreme Court Justices, namely: Premier Président (Chief Justice): Vincent Aristide (PN) Auditeurs: 1 Magnolia Steinmetz (PN) 2 Renaud Curie (PN) 3 Hubert Hebert (PN) 4 Mario Sy (PN) 5 Dimitri Sakhalov (PN) 6 Andre Michel (PN) 7 Simoun Lemaitre (PN) 8 Jacques Malaurie (PN) 9 Nicole d'Estaing (PN) 10 René Cote (PN) 11 Jérôme Letorneur (PN) 12 Véronique Mateaud (PN) 13 Pierre Lavigne (PN) 14 Olympe d'Aelders (PN) |
| Date | 14:25:16, July 02, 2013 CET | From | Parti Nationaliste 🌞 | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Conseil Constitutionnel (Supreme Court of Rildanor) |
| Message | Assemblée Nationale vs Ministre des Affaires estrangeres Re: Non-Recognition of the False Governments of Rebel States treaty 41% of the députés has challenged the Foreign Minister's proposal to ratify the treaty. The High Court voting 8-7 declaring the proposed treaty as unconstitutional and uninternationalist approach. Auditeur Mateaud wrote the concurring opinion that states that the treaty http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2506 especially Article 5 is inhumane. The country must provide aid especially to those victims affected by hunger, diseases and war related incidents. Citing the general law on humanity, whether the legitimate country approves the giving of aid or not, aid must be given unconditionally. Meanwhile, Premier Président Aristide dissented and wrote that the decision of the recognized legitimate government must be respected at all times. He cited that the basic international law is the highest besides the country's constitutional law. The decision is final and executory. However, may be overturned after 10 years. So ordered. Voting Record: 1 Magnolia Steinmetz (PN) aye 2 Renaud Curie (PN) nay 3 Hubert Hebert (PN) nay 4 Mario Sy (PN) aye 5 Dimitri Sakhalov (PN) nay 6 Andre Michel (PN) aye 7 Simoun Lemaitre (PN) aye 8 Jacques Malaurie (PN) aye 9 Nicole d'Estaing (PN) aye 10 René Cote (PN) nay 11 Jérôme Letorneur (PN) nay 12 Véronique Mateaud (PN) nay 13 Pierre Lavigne (PN) nay 14 Olympe d'Aelders (PN) nay 15 Vincent Aristide (PN) aye image of the voting results: tosscoin program http://s21.postimg.org/kat0q9hc7/assnat_vs_formin_luthoritreatyfalsegovs.jpg |
| Date | 02:14:17, July 04, 2013 CET | From | Parti Nationaliste 🌞 | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Conseil Constitutionnel (Supreme Court of Rildanor) |
| Message | Mordusian Luthori Royalists Organization vs Ministre des Affaires estrangeres Re: Non-Recognition of the New Mordusian Neutrality Pact The Mordusian Luthori Royalists Organization has challenged the Foreign Minister's proposal to ratify the treaty because of Mordusian involvement in the Majatran War. They proposed that the treaty be declared unsigned and illegal. The High Court voting 11-4 declaring the proposed treaty as constitutional and conforms to the legality of international law. Premier Président Aristide wrote the concurring opinion that states that the treaty http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2510 has been modified from the original one that lacks a provision of giving aid to a country being involved in a war, which some people may declare that this is a breach to neutrality principles. To conclude, he cited that since the Majatran War is over, and Mordusia, ipso facto, cannot be sued because a stalemate occurred, no winners and losers. Meanwhile, Auditeur Dimitri Sakhalov dissented and wrote that the decision of Mordusia to aid Zardugal automatically is a ground for nonrecognition of its neutrality. He said that any country will forever doubt Mordusia's neutrality in the coming years and even centuries because of their acts. The petition is dismissed. The decision is final and executory. However, may be overturned after 10 years. So ordered. Voting Record: 1 Magnolia Steinmetz (PN) nay 2 Renaud Curie (PN) nay 3 Hubert Hebert (PN) nay 4 Mario Sy (PN) nay 5 Dimitri Sakhalov (PN) aye 6 Andre Michel (PN) nay 7 Simoun Lemaitre (PN) nay 8 Jacques Malaurie (PN) aye 9 Nicole d'Estaing (PN) aye 10 René Cote (PN) nay 11 Jérôme Letorneur (PN) nay 12 Véronique Mateaud (PN) aye 13 Pierre Lavigne (PN) nay 14 Olympe d'Aelders (PN) nay 15 Vincent Aristide (PN) nay image of the voting results: tosscoin program http://s18.postimg.org/ah1473w5l/mordusroyal_vs_formin_mordusiatreatyneutrality.jpg |
| Date | 07:25:30, September 10, 2013 CET | From | Parti Nationaliste 🌞 | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Conseil Constitutionnel (Supreme Court of Rildanor) |
| Message | His Majesty, Paul, has confirmed the nominations of these new Supreme Court Justices, passed by the Assemblée nationale: Premier Président (Chief Justice): Godefroy Guillot (PN) Auditeurs: 1 Magnolia Steinmetz (PN) 2 Renaud Curie (PN) 3 Hubert Hebert (PN) 4 Hélène Béatrice Vigée-de Brunhilde (PN) 5 Louis-Napoléon de Pompadour (PN) 6 Adèle Marie Dufriche-Desgenettes (PN) 7 Simoun Lemaitre (PN) 8 Jacques Malaurie (PN) 9 Nicole d'Estaing (PN) 10 René Cote (PN) 11 Jérôme Letorneur (PN) 12 Véronique Bruneau (PN) 13 Frédérique Fourier (PN) 14 Olympe d'Aelders (PN) |
| Date | 15:01:36, September 14, 2013 CET | From | Parti Nationaliste 🌞 | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Conseil Constitutionnel (Supreme Court of Rildanor) |
| Message | updated* correction* His Majesty, Paul, has confirmed the nominations of these new Supreme Court Justices, passed by the Assemblée nationale: Premier Président (Chief Justice): Magnolia Steinmetz (PN) Auditeurs: 1 Marc-René de Valdec de Phélypeaux (PN) 2 Renaud Curie (PN) 3 Hubert Hebert (PN) 4 Hélène Béatrice Vigée-de Brunhilde (PN) 5 Louis-Napoléon de Pompadour (PN) 6 Adèle Marie Dufriche-Desgenettes (PN) 7 Simoun Lemaitre (PN) 8 Lothaire Michaël Félix (PN) 9 Nicole d'Estaing (PN) 10 René Cote (PN) 11 Jérôme Letorneur (PN) 12 Véronique Bruneau (PN) 13 Frédérique Fourier (PN) 14 Olympe d'Aelders (PN) |
| Date | 11:52:57, November 01, 2013 CET | From | Parti Nationaliste 🌞 | To | Debating the IMPORTANT: Conseil Constitutionnel (Supreme Court of Rildanor) |
| Message | His Majesty, Philippe III, has confirmed the nominations of these new Supreme Court Justices, passed by the Assemblée nationale: Premier Président (Chief Justice): Pierrick Séverin (PN) Auditeurs: 1 Marc-René de Valdec de Phélypeaux (PN) 2 Esther Sylviane Bernard (PN) 3 Orianne-Dianne Dupond (PN) 4 Hélène Béatrice Vigée-de Brunhilde (PN) 5 Louis-Napoléon de Pompadour (PN) 6 Adèle Marie Dufriche-Desgenettes (PN) 7 Valériane-Vienne Charpentier (PN) 8 Sévérine-Margaux Eustis (PN) 9 Sévérine-Margaux Eustis (PN) 10 Ermenegilde Dupond (PN) 11 Theirn Mullins (PN) 12 Véronique Bruneau (PN) 13 Frédérique Fourier (PN) 14 Maurice Lyon (PN) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 24 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 70 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - George W. Bush |