Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:30:05
Server time: 11:29:54, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): echizen | Freemarket21 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Devolution of Education Policy Making Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hosian Action Coalition

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3513

Description[?]:

Power is too centralised on our beloved nation that at times one wonders what the provincial governments actually do except maybe decide on fishing quotas. We propose to add to the responsibilities so as to make them more cost effective and to reduce the burdens of the central Government.

Dr. Gustavo Suarez
Chairman of the HAC

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:10:28, July 10, 2013 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Devolution of Education Policy Making Act
MessageMr Speaker,

we do not agree with article 3, since we do not believe that it is right to fund private schools unless it happens via a voucher system allowing parents can choose. The rest of this bill, however, would be an improvement over the status quo considering that full privatization, unfortunately, can currently not be reached due to parliamentary opposition.

Takeshi Shimoto MP
Member for Elbian
RFR Education spokesman

Date18:39:24, July 10, 2013 CET
FromDrania Cívica 🏴 시민당
ToDebating the Devolution of Education Policy Making Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Why are our students such a favorite target for the RFR and this apparent Hosian party. The current system functions extremely well. Our universities and other higher education institutions are top quality, and those which are public, can be easily attended by qualified students with minimal to no financial hardship.

The government is not in debt and we are not financially unstable. What is the purpose of destroying a well functioning system.

The parties supportive of these attacks on higher education are more interested in ideological purism than they are interested in doing what is best for the nation. The best option for the nation and for our students is to uphold the current government policies on higher education.

Jay Choi
KDF Vice-Chair
Minister of Science & Technology

Date19:26:06, July 10, 2013 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Devolution of Education Policy Making Act
MessageMr Speaker,

we do not comprehend the reasoning behind the claim that full subsidization of tuition combined with a coexistence of private and public universities has any benefits over a full privatization of the education system combined with a self-responsibility-promoting loans scheme to help disadvantaged students. It is not ideological purity what drives our support for private education, but an emphasis on efficiency and fiscal thrift.

Takeshi Shimoto MP
Member for Elbian
RFR Education Spokesman

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 93

no
      

Total Seats: 306

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called 'the People's Stick.'" - Mikhail Bakunin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59