Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:15:33
Server time: 05:44:26, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Taxation Act 3519

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Progressive Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 3519

Description[?]:

Part of the budget

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:39:12, July 22, 2013 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Taxation Act 3519
MessageMr Speaker,

this is an act of mindless job destruction and rabid class-warfarist zeal, which should be shred in pieces by this assembly with a blistering 'no' vote.

John Holbrooke MP
Member for Valdor
Minority Leader

Date12:42:39, July 22, 2013 CET
FromDemocratic Progressive Party
ToDebating the Taxation Act 3519
MessageOOC: Psst, remember the OOC fiscal readjustment plan? So don't get too pissed, although this obviously amounts to an IC tax change as well. Same goes for income tax.

Date12:49:44, July 22, 2013 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Taxation Act 3519
MessageOOC: Didn't we agree on an IC spending/tax scheme already? Although if there is a general consensus on this, I would vote in favor. Although it remains hard to explain where these rates would come from, since 17 years of right-wing rule would surely have reduced them to at least, say, 30%.

Date12:54:28, July 22, 2013 CET
FromDemocratic Progressive Party
ToDebating the Taxation Act 3519
MessageOOC: Well, that the one we had was still a bit retarded, given that government spending is in the teens.

Also, as I said, this is part OOC, part IC. So this is a tax increase - except not as much as it would otherwise seem.

Date12:56:42, July 22, 2013 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Taxation Act 3519
MessageOOC: Well yes, I'm gonna vote in favor of this because I can then promise to lower taxes ahead of the next election :-) Take it as an OOC vote though, I doubt the RFR in its current state of rage would support any tax hikes whatsoever.

Date13:59:51, July 22, 2013 CET
FromPopular Party
ToDebating the Taxation Act 3519
MessageOOC: I'm voting for this OOC'ly as well.

Date20:47:15, July 22, 2013 CET
FromRadical Liberal Party of Dranland
ToDebating the Taxation Act 3519
MessageOOC or not I won't vote for that much corporation tax

Date21:08:34, July 22, 2013 CET
FromDranish Agrarian League
ToDebating the Taxation Act 3519
MessageOOC: Also voting OOCly for Article 1 and 2 especially.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
        

Total Seats: 351

no
  

Total Seats: 48

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "The Lord is a man of war" - Exodus 15:3

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70