We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Confidentiality of Correspondence, 2158
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alliance 44
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2158
Description[?]:
It must be a really extreme situation when we would like to allow the authorities read our letters. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:16:15, December 20, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Imperial Party (Nazi Party) | To | Debating the Confidentiality of Correspondence, 2158 |
Message | He who has nothing to hide, shouldn't be affraid. He who is affraid is a criminal |
Date | 14:45:29, December 20, 2005 CET | From | Society of Sadists | To | Debating the Confidentiality of Correspondence, 2158 |
Message | And what if the Bolshies are in power and want to sieze your property? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 59 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 31 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 10 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "Public schools are government-established, politician- and bureaucrat-controlled, fully politicized, taxpayer-supported, authoritarian socialist institutions. In fact, the public-school system is one of the purest examples of socialism existing in America." - Thomas L. Johnson |