We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gated Communities
Details
Submitted by[?]: Phillipsian Party of Dranland
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3534
Description[?]:
| We believe the government should be able to set up gated communities as well as the private sector. -Caroline Ortega, Leader of the Phillipsian Party |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: The private sector can set up gated communities.
Current: No gated communities are allowed.
Proposed: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:28:37, August 20, 2013 CET | From | Civic Democratic Party | To | Debating the Gated Communities |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The government should not be in the business of creating "exclusive" communities. Jonathan Bradford, Leader of the Civic Democratic Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 61 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 218 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 101 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw |