We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fair Imminent Domain Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Broad Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3549
Description[?]:
| Proposed by Cᴏᴏᴘᴇʀ Mᴀᴛᴛʜᴇᴡs, the BF's Spokeperson for Infrastructure and Transport. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:53:57, September 20, 2013 CET | From | Freedom Republic Party | To | Debating the Fair Imminent Domain Act |
| Message | As you can see from this link http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=391412 I find it sad how the government feels it can take a mans home. :-( yet again, sorry i dont agree |
| Date | 00:15:37, September 21, 2013 CET | From | The Broad Front | To | Debating the Fair Imminent Domain Act |
| Message | It is sad but sometimes for the sake of the society in cases of public interest such measures are needed. Lᴜᴄɪᴜs Bᴜʀʀᴇʟʟ - BF's Spokeperson |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 244 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 246 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted. |
| Random quote: "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky |