We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Social Agenda of DHG
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dranish Hosian Greens
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3549
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Only couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.
Current: Adultery is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Proposed: Adultery is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change State penalties for blasphemy
Old value:: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Current: No state penalties are issued for blasphemy.
Proposed: Public blasphemy is considered a minor offense.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: The legality of divorces is left up to the local governments.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Divorces are only legal with grounded cause (such as adultery, or violence).
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government does not involve itself in marriage or civil unions.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Current: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Proposed: There is no official state religion, but the government only allows recognized religions. 'Cults' are persecuted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:32:12, September 21, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Social Agenda of DHG |
| Message | Mr Speaker, it seems the DHG are mistaking being pro-family or pro-religion with being pro-government. The nationalization of family business as suggested in the proposed changes to adultery laws proves this, as well as the proposed policy of making blasphemy an offense, which unduly targets the principle of free speech. We should also not forget that prosecuting non-crimes is an extraordinary waste of money that we need in fighting real crime. Yves Lonegan MP Member for Elbian RFR Justice Spokesman |
| Date | 11:49:42, September 21, 2013 CET | From | Dranish Hosian Greens | To | Debating the Social Agenda of DHG |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We will not get lectured by fascists top call girl in this country. We will not get lectured by a party that supports anti-freedom and pro-violence party. Finally we will not get lectured by a party that supports a party that advocates partition of this country. Religion has a place in our heart and we will defend our values and our beliefs, if you want to criticise our religion that is fine just do not insult it. Marriage is a sacred and serious institution and we want to make that contracts violation illegal but not prosecuted. Divorce on demand is just another violation of that contract and finally sir, there are people who likes the government and wants government recognition of those marriages and we represent those people this is why we endorse government recognition of marriage. Unlike you we only reject violent capitalism and reckless free market without proper regulations. Danielle Johnson Leader of DHG |
| Date | 12:58:55, September 21, 2013 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Social Agenda of DHG |
| Message | Mr Speaker, if everyone declared his personal believes beyond all criticism, freedom of speech would cease to exist instantly, yet the DHG seems to have no big issue with that, making their attempt to liken us to the fascists an absurd maneuver given that is them who disregard fundamental liberties. Regarding the violation of contracts, we agree that this should provoke legal consequences - but the specific modalities of these contracts should be defined by consenting individuals and not by a government bureaucrat. We will continue to stand against far-left and far-right attempts to nationalize family life. Yves Lonegan MP Member for Elbian RFR Justice Spokesman |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 141 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 258 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "Impossible is a word to be found only in the dictionary of fools." - Napoleon Bonaparte |