We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agriculture Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Market Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3560
Description[?]:
| The regulations in Agriculture are currently too tight with no reason.Redistribution of land is extremely outdated and reminds as of communist states where there is no private property. Also,local governments may not limit fishing enough to protect the fish,or they may be very strict causing damage to the economy.This should be a goverment responsibility. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning farm size.
Old value:: Farms that grow too large are broken up and the land redistributed.
Current: Small farms are encouraged to merge together into larger ones.
Proposed: Farm size is not regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Commercial fishing regulation.
Old value:: Local governments can establish fishing quotas
Current: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Proposed: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:06:42, October 11, 2013 CET | From | The National Front (NF) | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | The National Front will support these measures in confidence that it will better the nation. |
| Date | 20:08:36, October 11, 2013 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | we do not agree, this laws are good now |
| Date | 21:07:22, October 11, 2013 CET | From | Free Market Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | We ask the Socialist Party to see the reasoning,especially on Article 1. Land Redistribution is a horrible mistake,it is outrageous to have such laws in 3559. |
| Date | 21:28:20, October 11, 2013 CET | From | The National Front (NF) | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | Does the Socialist Party have a justification of the breaking up of larger farms? Would they not be capable of providing more food for our people and a surplus that could be sold in international markets? National Front leadership believes that larger farms are better for the nation - it is as simple as that. |
| Date | 11:52:51, October 12, 2013 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Agriculture Reform Act |
| Message | ok we can vote for it |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 230 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways." - Buddha |