Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:47:15
Server time: 11:12:44, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dannypk19 | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: FSDP Free Economics and Restricted Pornography Act 3561

Details

Submitted by[?]: FSD Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3562

Description[?]:

Article 1 - Non-Consensual sexual acts should never be legal, nor should pornography depicting them. The FSDP realises that banning pornography is not a viable option, nor is attempting to only allow adults to view it - so we will control the type of material the population has access to, allowing pornography that depicts consenting adults is a sensible restriction.

Article 2 - The Government needs to start to free the market slightly, this is a good start. We should not require anything like this.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:02:13, October 16, 2013 CET
FromFSD Party
ToDebating the FSDP Free Economics and Restricted Pornography Act 3561
MessageMr Speaker,

We believe that this sensible restriction on the content of pornography is well in line with the moral sensibilities of the nation. Pornography depicting non consensual sex acts and minors is disgusting and we should lower the potential of this type of material entering the market by the force of law.

- William Harper,
President of Lodamun.

Date04:45:07, October 16, 2013 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the FSDP Free Economics and Restricted Pornography Act 3561
MessageWe see no problem with the bill, and we apologise for having ignored these issues before.

--

Dereck Moore,
Chairman of the NRG,
Vice President of Lodamun

Date00:36:54, October 17, 2013 CET
FromFSD Party
ToDebating the FSDP Free Economics and Restricted Pornography Act 3561
MessageIC:
Mr Speaker,

While we understand the opposition of the Monarchist Party, we do enquire as to why they believe that pornography depicting minors and non consensual sex acts should still be allowed. I call upon the right honourable opposition to provide their reasoning for opposition to this bill.

- Marcus Sampson,
Member from Kregon, FSDP.

OOC:

I am actually interested in what your opposition is to, the pornography or the economics part? If it is the economics part I apologise for the assumption that it is the pornography part, but I feel that is what would happen in a real parliament - some rude backbencher would try to demonise you out of spite.
- JS.

Date02:45:53, October 17, 2013 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the FSDP Free Economics and Restricted Pornography Act 3561
MessageMr. Speaker,

We also call for the Monarchist Party to explain their opposition to the bill.

--

Dereck Moore,
Chairman of the NRG,
Vice President of Lodamun

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 155

no
  

Total Seats: 145

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well.

Random quote: "The packaging for a microwavable 'microwave' dinner is programmed for a shelf life of maybe six months, a cook time of two minutes and a landfill dead-time of centuries." - David Wann

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55