Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5476
Next month in: 03:26:56
Server time: 08:33:03, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): MyungJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Morality Laws I (3564)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Dranish Wiki Maintenance Group

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3566

Description[?]:

Mr.Speaker,

The morality of Dranish society has been so far eroded by the anarchic, capitalist parties that it is a shell of anything it could perhaps one day be. Basic moral values and decencies have been lost and without correction and guidance, Dranland will never be a great power or a nation capable of fulfilling its destiny.

Thus, the Valdorian Blue Shirt Movement introduces the first of the Morality Laws aimed at correcting the moral slide of Dranish society.

Maximo Salazar
Jefe de Partido

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:56:08, October 22, 2013 CET
FromHacia Casa
ToDebating the The Morality Laws I (3564)
MessageMr Speaker,

This is a step in the right direction towards good, decent, traditional Hosian and Egelian values.

Fabricio Alvarado MP
Acting Leader of Hacia Casa

Date20:14:59, October 22, 2013 CET
FromNational Libertarian
ToDebating the The Morality Laws I (3564)
Message-On a TV politics show-

Corrupt and fascist. What a total discgrace. You want to ban small religions and force your totalitarian atheism upon us all, it is impossible to ban cults without banning free speech. Every Religion started as a cult, and these religions havee grown powerful, are we to think that the state has an upcoming religion to fear? Is this why they want to take away our freedom of speech?

What does it matter who, which god, or what you choose to worship, as long as you practice your rituals within the laws of the land? Who would determine the label of 'cult'? Some people would say that Catholics are a cult, some people would say Jehova's witnesses are a cult, some people say Jews are a cult, will there be a big black list of banned religions? Will I be killed for my beliefs? Because believe me i'm prepared to die for them.

Polygamy and Homosexuality being banned? Really? You think if we ban polygamy and homosexuality tommorow everyone's gonna stop loving their partners? Do you have no heart? If that thing called the government you worship were to ban being heterosexual, would you stop loving your wife? Of course not, why would you want to ban people from loving their partners, when it is nothing to do with you what-so-ever? Who do you think you people are? When you go home to your wives, do you love anything about them or did you just bag the best you could get? No, of course you love them, and so do Gays love their partners, and they want to be with them. They do not say "I love you because of your gender" they just simply say "I love you."

And gays in the millitary? the DHA can hardly call themselves patriotic with a hate for our BRAVE YOUNG MEN WHO WILL DIE FOR THIS GREAT COUNTRY, HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT THEY SHOULD BE BARRED FROM FIGHTING BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY DO IN THEIR BEDROOM HOW DARE YOU!?? THIS BILL IS A DISCGRACE AND IS ENOUGH TO MAKE ANYONE FEEL SICK!

Shame on you, you fucking scumbags.

Reagen Shayna, NL Leader.

Date21:35:08, October 22, 2013 CET
FromDranish Agrarian League
ToDebating the The Morality Laws I (3564)
MessageOOC: I'll RP the speaker since there is none

Mr Shayna, watch your language, this is not some beerhall or men's club but Parliament. The vulgarity in your last statement is unaccepable.

Alberto Gomez
Speaker

Date22:25:58, October 22, 2013 CET
FromNational Libertarian
ToDebating the The Morality Laws I (3564)
MessageI suppose you're gonna censor that too?

Reagen Shayna,
NL Leader.

Date03:13:42, October 23, 2013 CET
FromDranish Agrarian League
ToDebating the The Morality Laws I (3564)
MessageOOC: Effing scumbag, does that seem like parliamentary language?

Date13:28:44, October 23, 2013 CET
FromKoalisjon for frigjøring
ToDebating the The Morality Laws I (3564)
MessageOOC: Ehmm! I think there is a bit of confusion here. First the leader was on national television so speaker has no ruling here but scumbags on national television does not sound good either.

Date13:32:41, October 23, 2013 CET
FromDranish Agrarian League
ToDebating the The Morality Laws I (3564)
MessageOOC: What do TV interviews have to do with bill discussions?

Date19:55:27, October 23, 2013 CET
FromNational Libertarian
ToDebating the The Morality Laws I (3564)
MessageOOC: NL had no MPs at the time so we can't really speak in parliament xD

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 146

no
      

Total Seats: 246

abstain
 

Total Seats: 7


Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360

Random quote: "The true destiny of America is religious, not political: it is spiritual, not physical." - Alvin R. Dyer

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 84