Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 01:12:14
Server time: 02:47:45, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update

Details

Submitted by[?]: Redneck Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2162

Description[?]:

After some dicussion amongst ourselves in the redneck party we would like to submit to you a policy concrening a possible change to our current law regarding the purchasing of pharmaceutical drugs. Helping pay for the pharmaceutical medicines of low income will help them get back to work sooner and supply the companies with more workers and us with healthly citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:27:19, December 22, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageStrongly approve, if the Finance Minister thinks we can afford this :D

Date05:03:54, December 23, 2005 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageWe shall oppose. This will drive up our expenses even more than it is now. I suggest the finance minister look into abit more before making statements.

Date11:16:33, December 23, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageThe well being of our people is a matter we must consider before matters of profit, we may be only "Human resources" but tehre are lives we are talking about here.

Date14:06:48, December 23, 2005 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageYes there are lives we're talking about here but we also have a budget deficit that we need to get rid of first.

Date20:03:50, December 23, 2005 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageSo Rightist you are saying that money is more important than lives? There has to be a balance my friend. By allowing people to obtain medicine we prevent them from dieing, which incrases the amount of people who are able to work which there in turn allows for more merchandise to be produced and that would cause a increase in productivity.

Date23:52:22, December 23, 2005 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageDo you want to put us into a bigger deficit?

Date00:45:59, December 24, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageWe have asked the members of government to comment on what the Ministry of Finance shall do, where we shall reduce costs. And asked for them to contribute to ideas (see seperate thread), but there seems to be no interest whatsoever from any party, especially the Rightish party to do anything about this more then to halt any progress of society. Where should cutbacks be made, the Finance Minister asked, with the hope of the government giving ideas and such, and support a move, but nothing has been said.

And the Rightish party spoke so highly of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs being the ONLY one whom shall bother with the foreign affairs, now we wonder if the Rightish party has the same logic when it comes to Finances, which he clearly shows he has not.

Date01:45:53, December 24, 2005 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageThe cut backs should be that we should move things to the local governments and not do anything through the federal government. That's a good place to start in saving money.

Date00:58:02, December 26, 2005 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Pharmaceutical Drugs Policy Update
MessageMove what things from the federal govt? It is the government's job to ensure a good living for all of our people, why let the local govts play favorties, keep it higher up and see how much live improves.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 57

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
          

    Total Seats: 242


    Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

    Random quote: "People say I steal. Well, all politicians steal." - Huey Long

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60