We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Uniao Socialista
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3575
Description[?]:
| For too long have private contractors dominated the Defence Industry of our nation.Hereby we propose the re-establishment of TUK-ARMS National Factory.The reason is simple.While we create more jobs to fight unemployment,we produce our own arms,armored cars and tanks.The old,trustworthy B.I.G Mk III ,the famous self propeled Artillery which has been constructed by the old TUK-ARMS,is still very much in use by many armored and artillery divisions.Furthermore,private industries are CORPORATIONS and they want profit.This means that they may sell secrets about our armored divisions,or our arms to foreign countries for pure profit. As for the second proposal we believe that the current law is a conservative disgrace.Homosexuality,is not taboo as it used to be,and homosexuals have rights too.Even if some conservative parties don't like it. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Current: Open homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military has a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
Proposed: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:40:28, November 10, 2013 CET | From | People's Front of Tukarali | To | Debating the Military Reform Act |
| Message | While we wholeheartedly support Article 1 (having tried to implement it on our national legislation before), we cannot vote 'yes' taking in account the contents of Article 2. |
| Date | 18:26:43, November 11, 2013 CET | From | Democratic Workers Party | To | Debating the Military Reform Act |
| Message | While the DWP supports creating a protection for our citizens through national defense industries, we also believe in preserving the moral traditions in our military, and cannot support the overall bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 26 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 82 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 17 |
| Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures. |
| Random quote: "'The illusion of Pontesi nationhood'. The Serpent speaks. How can they say these things? How can they call our country an illusion? You can see it clear as day, these people won’t stop until they’ve destroyed us all." - Morgan Einar, former Pontesian general |