We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Infrastructure Reforms Mission
Details
Submitted by[?]: United People's Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3575
Description[?]:
| Train Operations: Reverting to old pro-economy policy that was disregarded by the fascist regime last time. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: There is a single publicly owned TOC.
Current: There is a single publicly owned TOC.
Proposed: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:51:39, November 10, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reforms Mission |
| Message | More Train companies means more competitiveness which is good. Allowing private companies to exist is good for our economy. We personally would have gone further and cometely privatised the TOCs but our economy is not yet completely ready for that so this is a good middle step Stijn Servaes |
| Date | 23:06:01, November 10, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reforms Mission |
| Message | You are correct, Stjin. We had introduced this measure to help grow the economy directly, around 20 years back. But the last regime overturned it, getting it back. |
| Date | 23:12:02, November 10, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reforms Mission |
| Message | We dont see why the RDNP disagrees. We ask for further explanation |
| Date | 23:14:05, November 10, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reforms Mission |
| Message | RDNP's stand against! Why so? |
| Date | 23:54:10, November 10, 2013 CET | From | Republican Democratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reforms Mission |
| Message | The thing is privatisation would put the the state rail in disadvantages, due to the necessity to cope with competetive. I dont mind agreeing with it but I would first like to see a the state rail reach an extremely high standard. So its actually not "NO" rather "NOT NOW" |
| Date | 00:01:14, November 11, 2013 CET | From | Republican Democratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reforms Mission |
| Message | so we suggest a major bump in infrastructure spending |
| Date | 02:39:34, November 11, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reforms Mission |
| Message | The way we see it is that this is a step to completely privatising the TOC business. You say we put the state rail in disadvantage, we say that the state rail would just benifit from being competetive. You want a major bump in infrastructure spending, well when we get the post of Finance minister we will see if we can better utilise our budget and now I know that that is something that your party wants we will take that in consideration |
| Date | 02:55:42, November 11, 2013 CET | From | Republican Democratic Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Infrastructure Reforms Mission |
| Message | Till then..... :) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 170 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 113 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 117 |
| Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
| Random quote: "Communism is like prohibition, it's a good idea but it won't work." - Will Rogers |