Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 03:23:26
Server time: 20:36:33, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Real Freedom Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Workers Army

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2160

Description[?]:

Some members of the AAS believe that our parties pay little more than lip-service to the ideal of freedom. A consortium of "Absolute Freedom" have, therefore, guided the following legislation to the Senate floor.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:05:00, December 23, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Party
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Real Freedom Act
MessageWe oppose Article 3 as the publication of false information in the media can negatively affect the business and political environment of the country.

Date08:36:18, December 23, 2005 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Anarch Anakrousite Shatter Reform Bill - Real Freedom Act
MessageThe AAS disagrees. After all, if a media source gets a REPUTATION for publishing falsehoods, it will never be believed... it will be viewed as 'joke' media.

On the other hand, if a person is unsure from just one source, they can cross reference with any number of other sources. Indeed, the 'injured' party in a situation such as you suggest, has a vested interest AND a pre-prepared 'market' for their version of the story.

The AAS actually sees it as a move to IMPROVE the honesty of the media... since a source has more to gain by being proved repeatedly true.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 126

no
    

Total Seats: 258

abstain
   

Total Seats: 116


Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68