We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 3578
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Republic Independence Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3579
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the United People's Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Beluzian Republic Independence Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Encarta Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Republican Democratic Nationalist Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the United People's Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Beluzian Republic Independence Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Encarta Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the United People's Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Republican Democratic Nationalist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Beluzian Republic Independence Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the United People's Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Republican Democratic Nationalist Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Beluzian Republic Independence Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:59:22, November 18, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | Early proposal for a cabinet. I get four posts, rep get three, encarta gets 2 and upp which sadly lost aLot of votes gets three. Open to discussion |
Date | 02:33:56, November 18, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Liberty Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | Congrats to all, rule well, keep liberty in mind. |
Date | 04:07:18, November 18, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Communist League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | I feel left out! :) |
Date | 16:24:04, November 18, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | A good proposal, but what about the BCL? |
Date | 16:43:36, November 18, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | Our government is based on privatisation and liberty. Which means having a small government. We view that BCL's policies as they have stated to be big government based. This is our reasoning for not bringing them in the coalition Ooc: nothing against you xD, I would like having a good opposition too. |
Date | 23:32:29, November 18, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Communist League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | Well of course it's gonna make me sad. But I'll still fight it. But good luck to you! :) I feel strongly that every side should have a choice. Even big sides. |
Date | 13:17:49, November 19, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Liberty Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | We are not in the cabinet but we are ok with that. We will stand in the loyal opposition. |
Date | 18:02:40, November 19, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | The BCL's views aren't clear as yet: Do you expect to have cabinet positions or would you be satisfied being in opposition? I would be glad to have you as a part of the cabinet, and would vote 'yes' to this bill only if and when you clearly state that you have no intention of being part of the cabinet. Else, if yo wish to be in, I'll have to vote against even though the OCL's proposal is adequately strong. Waiting for your response, BCL. |
Date | 20:55:53, November 19, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | Okay until then, to avoid further confusion, we vote 'yes' to this proposal as we had wished to anyway since this seems like a fair representation of other parties in the cabinet, and we support the OCL's proposals definitely. |
Date | 22:08:28, November 19, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Republic Independence Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 3578 |
Message | We appreciate the BLP for supporting our majority coalition and reshuffling of ministers even though you're not a part of it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 198 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 202 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "All history has been a history of class struggles between dominated classes at various stages of social development." - Friedrich Engels |