We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Separation of Powers
Details
Submitted by[?]: Encarta Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3586
Description[?]:
This time with titles. Also, not a monarchy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: President
Current: President
Proposed: Commissioner-General
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:20:37, December 01, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | HoS? |
Date | 20:51:44, December 01, 2013 CET | From | Beluzian Liberty Party | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | I opened up a debate for HoS title... |
Date | 14:50:08, December 02, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | If this bill fails now, how about, for the next time it is put up, we have the HoG as Commissioner-General? that is if the hog is chancellor or something like that, as the blp suggested? |
Date | 17:02:03, December 02, 2013 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | OOC: I had suggested making the legislature "Legislative Commission" or "Estates Commission" with the HoS being the "Commissioner" |
Date | 02:55:32, December 03, 2013 CET | From | Encarta Party | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | Commissioner-General it is. Let's hope to god we can get this passed. We're looking for 266. At this rate, I don't think it'll happen. |
Date | 02:57:53, December 03, 2013 CET | From | Encarta Party | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | Right now, if votes line up like they did the last couple of times, we're at 202. We hope the Communists and the RDNP see the wisdom of this split and decide to vote on the side of true democracy and not be the puppets of a corrupted party. |
Date | 19:11:08, December 03, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | I hope this is supported by all realizing the true good intentions here. And, the Ltm3311 Party has been really inactive for weeks now and is still up here without getting inactivated; their user page shows no last activity, must be some sort of technical error. We must report this to the game moderator and let new parties, if any, have a place instead. (No more than 8 parties can exist in a country, and including them we have 8...so why keep them when they are not even around?) |
Date | 22:25:33, December 03, 2013 CET | From | Encarta Party | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | While we're happy for the support of this bill, we still do not have enough of a majority to pass it. It seems like Stanton will not switch sides, so hopefully the RDNP will see the positives of this measure. |
Date | 13:00:14, December 05, 2013 CET | From | United People's Party | To | Debating the Separation of Powers |
Message | I believe Stanton House's vote for this measure is guaranteed if there's a proposal to have only the majority party have the authority to put up the cabinet coalition bill. Think it's worthy, do consider. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 228 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 115 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 57 |
Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: Henceforth, the current system of first and second class stamps, where the rich can pay to have their mail delivered faster than the poor, shall be BANNED. There shall be only one class of mail delivery, and ALL mail shall travel at the SAME speed for EVERYBODY. There can be no class discrimination in the People's Post Office! There must be the SAME class of mail service FOR ALL! ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |