Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:40:06
Server time: 19:19:53, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AR Drax | ChevaldelaMer | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Abtreibung Freiheit Akt

Details

Submitted by[?]: Demokraten 85

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3586

Description[?]:

This nation's women should have their full reproductive rights given to them and for those who can't afford exercising those rights, they should be given assistance. With the massive surplus, the state can certainly afford it.

Hannelore Schlutz
Leader of D85

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:17:59, December 03, 2013 CET
FromHosianisch-Demokratisches Verbund
ToDebating the Abtreibung Freiheit Akt
MessageHerr Präsident,

Abortion carries medical risks, and a wide range of more preferable options exist. Regardless of the life and choice debate, this extreme measure is dangerous to the health of women in this country and should not be passed.

Matiasu Fukuyama, MdR (HDV - Schneeberge Takayama, Mitrania)
Klubobmann und Partieobmann des HDVs.

Date15:06:25, December 03, 2013 CET
FromInternationale Kommunistische Partei
ToDebating the Abtreibung Freiheit Akt
MessageHerr Präsident,

Abortion is far less dangerous than birth.

Sascha Meinhof
Vorsitzende der provisorischen Revolutionären Komitees

Date18:56:10, December 03, 2013 CET
FromHosianisch-Demokratisches Verbund
ToDebating the Abtreibung Freiheit Akt
MessageHerr Präsident,

I should remind Frau Meinhof, as one who has seen his wife go through it, that we know that giving birth is painful and stressful for women. But late-term abortions involve partial birth, and are thus only different in the sense that a purposely dead child is born instead of a live one.

I need not remind the House that while birth is a natural process, abortion is not. It is a medical procedure, and even though we prefer alternatives like adoption to it, we can imagine cases where its use is justified, maybe even praiseworthy. But then evaluate it as the medical procedure it is, not as if it's as natural as giving birth would be. Weigh the possible risks ("do no harm", the Medical Oath requires), and we have to conclude that in the case of late-term abortions, they far outweigh the potential benefits, regardless of the whole right-to-life and right-to-choose debate.

Matiasu Fukuyama, MdR
Klubobmann und Parteiobmann des HDVs

Date19:19:31, December 03, 2013 CET
FromWirtschaftliche Autonomie Partei
ToDebating the Abtreibung Freiheit Akt
MessageWe are not committed on the issue, but we hope that the right of citizens to their own bodies is not in question.

Joachim Groschen
MP-Budenlar
WAP Whip

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 303

no
    

Total Seats: 340

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved.

    Random quote: "How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it." - Marcus Aurelius

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60