Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 00:34:07
Server time: 15:25:52, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Abtreibung Freiheit Akt

Details

Submitted by[?]: Demokraten 85

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3586

Description[?]:

This nation's women should have their full reproductive rights given to them and for those who can't afford exercising those rights, they should be given assistance. With the massive surplus, the state can certainly afford it.

Hannelore Schlutz
Leader of D85

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:17:59, December 03, 2013 CET
From Hosianisch-Demokratisches Verbund
ToDebating the Abtreibung Freiheit Akt
MessageHerr Präsident,

Abortion carries medical risks, and a wide range of more preferable options exist. Regardless of the life and choice debate, this extreme measure is dangerous to the health of women in this country and should not be passed.

Matiasu Fukuyama, MdR (HDV - Schneeberge Takayama, Mitrania)
Klubobmann und Partieobmann des HDVs.

Date15:06:25, December 03, 2013 CET
From Internationale Kommunistische Partei
ToDebating the Abtreibung Freiheit Akt
MessageHerr Präsident,

Abortion is far less dangerous than birth.

Sascha Meinhof
Vorsitzende der provisorischen Revolutionären Komitees

Date18:56:10, December 03, 2013 CET
From Hosianisch-Demokratisches Verbund
ToDebating the Abtreibung Freiheit Akt
MessageHerr Präsident,

I should remind Frau Meinhof, as one who has seen his wife go through it, that we know that giving birth is painful and stressful for women. But late-term abortions involve partial birth, and are thus only different in the sense that a purposely dead child is born instead of a live one.

I need not remind the House that while birth is a natural process, abortion is not. It is a medical procedure, and even though we prefer alternatives like adoption to it, we can imagine cases where its use is justified, maybe even praiseworthy. But then evaluate it as the medical procedure it is, not as if it's as natural as giving birth would be. Weigh the possible risks ("do no harm", the Medical Oath requires), and we have to conclude that in the case of late-term abortions, they far outweigh the potential benefits, regardless of the whole right-to-life and right-to-choose debate.

Matiasu Fukuyama, MdR
Klubobmann und Parteiobmann des HDVs

Date19:19:31, December 03, 2013 CET
From Wirtschaftliche Autonomie Partei
ToDebating the Abtreibung Freiheit Akt
MessageWe are not committed on the issue, but we hope that the right of citizens to their own bodies is not in question.

Joachim Groschen
MP-Budenlar
WAP Whip

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 303

no
    

Total Seats: 340

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

    Random quote: "I worked at a factory owned by Germans, at coal pits owned by Frenchmen, and at a chemical plant owned by Belgians. There I discovered something about capitalists. They are all alike, whatever the nationality. All they wanted from me was the most work for the least money that kept me alive. So I became a communist." - Nikita Khrushchev

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60