We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: NPH Loves the Whores
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free White Castle and The People Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2164
Description[?]:
| Whereas; Each individual should be sovereign over his or her own body; and Whereas; Laws regarding prostitution are stigmatizing and outdated; and Whereas; Laws illegalizing prostitution result in the victimization of prostitutes; it is Resolved; That prostitution shall be a legal and recognized profession. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right for a person to prostitute himself or herself.
Old value:: Prostitution is illegal.
Current: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Proposed: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:57:06, December 24, 2005 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the NPH Loves the Whores |
| Message | This is what I never understood. It is legal for persons to be paid to have sex w/ another person for the purposes of making a movie that can be viewed by a third part for the purposes of sexual gratification. However, it is illegal for that third party to directly contract w/ those persons to sexually gratify himself or herself. Would it be legal for that third party to contract w/ those persons to sexually gratify him or her on film for his own later titillation? NPH thinks that sex should be free (well not free in this case), but the point is the same. |
| Date | 11:59:58, December 24, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the NPH Loves the Whores |
| Message | Yes, yes, yes, YEEEEEESSSS!!! |
| Date | 12:31:33, December 24, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the NPH Loves the Whores |
| Message | The pre-pubescent school kids are at their dirty tricks again? |
| Date | 12:39:28, December 24, 2005 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the NPH Loves the Whores |
| Message | Yes, I am in school. But law school. All my proposals are serious ones w/ sound reasoning, but you can't blame me for having some fun with it, can you? |
| Date | 02:10:16, December 27, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the NPH Loves the Whores |
| Message | No! No! NOOOOO! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 215 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 394 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 141 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx |