We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: military progression
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Nationalist Fraction
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3621
Description[?]:
We understand that an army is necessary. Not only to defend our nations and its inhabitants, but also to help our nation in times of crisis, disaster, etc... We understand that soldiers and military personnel should be though, but we don't understand why a homosexual person could not be a fine soldier. Maybe it is time to allow homosexuals in the military... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:13:33, February 09, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the military progression |
Message | We understand that some people would find it difficult to openly allow and support homosexuality in the military. That is why we propose a DADT-policy. Ted Murphy P&A chairman |
Date | 22:32:01, February 09, 2014 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the military progression |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We would be okay with open homosexuality being allowed in the military. We don't have to stop at DADT. -- Motya Bogomolov, Defence Minister |
Date | 13:26:47, February 10, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the military progression |
Message | Our party totally agrees with you. We just didn't want to push it. We'll alter our bill. Ted Murphy |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 599 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door. That's the only difference." - Ralph Nader |