We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Mobilization bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Nationalist Fraction
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3634
Description[?]:
| Cases in which our reserve troops should be mobilized. After ratification of this bill, troops can be mobilized without consent of the Presidium. This bill makes sure the reserve troops can be implemented swiftly. 1. State of readiness, when: - one of our neighbouring countries is in conflict; - one of our allies (with which we have military support agreements) is at war; - there is a considerably high troop activity in one of our neighbouring countries. 2. Partial mobillization, when: - the nation is struck by a natural disaster (engineer corpses); - there is an uproar; 3. Effective mobilization, when: - nationals or national troops have been attacked directly; - foreign troops cross the borders; - there is a large troops concentration along our borders; - there is presumptive evidence of an imminent nuclear attack. All other cases will be studied and will be presented to the Presidium and/or Military High Command for evaluation. Signed, Anton Spinoy Minister of Defence |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:25:25, March 10, 2014 CET | From |  Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Mobilization bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, This makes sense to us, except that we are opposed to having allies who we would be obligated to defend. -- Motya Bogomolov, NRG Spokesman on Defence |
| Date | 16:20:22, March 10, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Mobilization bill |
| Message | Mr. Bogomolow, the part with the allies is put in the bill just in case we shoul have an ally with which we have a military support stance. We see your point, we will clear up that part. Anton Spinoy |
| Date | 20:50:50, March 10, 2014 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Mobilization bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We are opposed to agreements which give our military external obligations. -- Motya Bogomolov, NRG Spokesman on Defence |
| Date | 04:54:20, March 11, 2014 CET | From | Allied Humanists | To | Debating the Mobilization bill |
| Message | We fully support this bill as we believe, contrary to the imbeciles of the NRG, that allies are absolutely necessary and by us lending a hand it forges a "friendship" so to speak which may come in handy in the event that we need external help. Stella Steel Defence Correspondent |
| Date | 07:12:01, March 11, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Mobilization bill |
| Message | Colleagues, I wish to clarify that we do not propose any alliance in this bill. We just state that, if in case there would be an alliance with a nation, that demands our military support, we would only take measures to prepare mobilization when that nation is under attack. We do not mobilize at that time. Reason for a higher state of alert would be that, when an ally would be under attack, it seems possible that we too would be attacked. Anton Spinoy |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 111 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 221 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 267 |
| Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
| Random quote: "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their essential difference is this: the communist, seeing the rich man and his fine home, says: 'No man should have so much.' The capitalist, seeing the same thing, says: 'All men should have as much.'" - Phelps Adams |