We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Baugesetz von 3634
Details
Submitted by[?]: Monarchistische Reformpartei
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3636
Description[?]:
| This bill aims to change the building code. Since most buildings are equipped with provisions for Civil Defense we move to suspend this provision for the time being. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: No new buildings may be constructed unless they feature provisions for civil defence.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:35:25, March 11, 2014 CET | From | Dundorfische Nationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | I have been informed by the Chief of Staff of the Oberkommando der Streitkräfte the Armed Forces are deeply against this measure and the Ministry of Defence would like to perform further research into this matter before a vote is called on the matter. We are requesting the MRP leadership delay this bill entering the floor of the Reichstag by merely an additional 6 months. Wolfgang Volger Reich Minister of Defence |
| Date | 01:45:19, March 11, 2014 CET | From | Monarchistische Reformpartei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | This delay can be arranged although we cannot see any thing speaking against it as an infrastructural measure. Ferdinand von Alt Minister of Infrastructure |
| Date | 01:47:09, March 11, 2014 CET | From | Dundorf kaiserlichen Liberalen Partei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | We cannot support this as it localizes the defense of the nation. Karl Engfer Leftwing caucus leader |
| Date | 00:27:41, March 12, 2014 CET | From | Dundorfische Nationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | Following further research into this matter by the MoD we have judged that this bill by thr MRP would damage the Reich's ability to defend itself considering the Reich's current overwhelming superiority over its neighbors and the very slim chance of any external threat. The MoD subsequently supports this bill. Wolfgang Volker Reich Minister of Defence |
| Date | 01:31:26, March 12, 2014 CET | From | Dundorf kaiserlichen Liberalen Partei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | Mr. Volker are you insinuating that you would rather support a bill that would destroy the Reich you are sworn to protect? If so, that is a clear attack against this Reich, and is subject to being equal to treason. Karl Engfer Leftwing caucus leader |
| Date | 06:01:48, March 12, 2014 CET | From | Dundorfische Nationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | Herr Engfer I have served 37 years in the Reichsheer retiring as an Oberst within the OKS before I joined politics. The fact that you would dare question my loyalty to the a Reich I have served since I was 18 many years before you were ever a public servant is an insult. However I am willing to ignore your comment and merely ask how this bill will destroy the Reich and it's ability to protect itself when we have the single.larhest defence budget on the continent, the most powerful military and the fact all building for the last 60 years were built along the lines. This bill merely allows local government the ability to maintain them. Wolfgang Volker Reich Minister of Defence |
| Date | 04:40:11, March 13, 2014 CET | From | Dundorfische Nationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | OOC: btw made a typo in my post supporting the bill. It should say this bill wouldn't, not would... i believe that was the mix up here |
| Date | 16:19:20, March 13, 2014 CET | From | Dundorf kaiserlichen Liberalen Partei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | Ooc: That would be the mix up here. I would like to retract my accusations against the MoD on this bill. To me it sounded like you knew it would damage Dundorf, but still wanted it to pass, lol. |
| Date | 02:36:51, March 14, 2014 CET | From | Dundorfische Nationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Baugesetz von 3634 |
| Message | OOC: no harm no foul lol |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 227 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 94 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
| Random quote: "Take our country back" - Conservative Republican campaign slogan for the 4690 Likatonian election |