We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Economic Act, May 3637
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Vorona
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3638
Description[?]:
| ~ |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Closed shops are places of employment where only members of a specific union are allowed to work; union shops can hire non-members, but these have to become members after a certain time; agency shops can hire non-members, who have to pay a fee to cover the unions costs. All three are erected by union agreements. (Only valid if unions are legal)
Old value:: Closed shops, union shops and agency shops are legal.
Current: Only open shops are legal.
Proposed: This issue is decided by local governments.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Collective bargaining
Old value:: Public and private sector employees have the right to collectively bargain
Current: No employees may engage in collective bargaining
Proposed: No employees may engage in collective bargaining
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Employers are free to fire workers who go on strike.
Proposed: Government approval is needed before strikers can be fired.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government law concerning the sales of recreational drugs.
Old value:: The matter of sales of recreational drugs is handled by local governments.
Current: Sales of recreational drugs is completely unregulated.
Proposed: There is no policy concerning the sales of recreational drugs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:28:12, March 17, 2014 CET | From | Conservative Unitarian Party | To | Debating the Economic Act, May 3637 |
| Message | The CUP rejects articles 2 and 4. Collective bargaining serves to give workers a voice in their place of work and their right to fight for fair wages should not be infringed upon. Additionally, the CUP rejects the notion of leaving all recreational drug commerce unregulated as this create a large drop in revenue and negatively impact the productivity of the nation. |
| Date | 22:02:29, March 17, 2014 CET | From | Conservative Party of Vorona | To | Debating the Economic Act, May 3637 |
| Message | The workers won't lose their voice whatsoever. In case they're unhappy with their work conditions, they are free to seek the State so that the government may look upon the legitimacy of their claims and, if positive, grant them the right to strike and prevent strikers of being fired. All in all, it will find a solution that will satisfy both sides without greater damages. The thing about collective bargaining is that it ends up as an abusive one-sided right as workers emphasize their interests over the interests of the nation, the taxpayers, the companies, etc., which are equally important. As for Article 4, the less the government gets involved in the Market, the better it will develop. By unregulating this matter, we let it free to develop in the proper way which will cause the opposite effect that you've mentioned. Igor Bardon RPV's Parliament Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes | Total Seats: 100 | |
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
| Random quote: "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people and neither do we." - George W. Bush |