Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:11:54
Server time: 19:48:05, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Recognition of Polygamy Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Feministas Verdes

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3643

Description[?]:

This act proposes a change in the nation's current policy to recognise polygamous marriages as equal to monogamous marriages, awarding the citizens of Beluzia who identify as polyamarous and which to enter into polygamous marriages

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:32:12, March 28, 2014 CET
FromBeluzian Syndicalist Party
ToDebating the Recognition of Polygamy Act
MessageWe see no reason not to support this bill.

Date09:42:34, March 28, 2014 CET
FromFeministas Verdes
ToDebating the Recognition of Polygamy Act
MessageOOC: No idea what happened to the description. It should read: 'This act proposes a change in the nation's current policy to recognise polygamous marriages as equal to monogamous marriages, awarding equal rights to the citizens of Beluzia who identify as polyamarous and wish to enter into polygamous marriages.'

Date12:35:27, March 28, 2014 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Recognition of Polygamy Act
MessageWe cannot support a bill that is so harmful to children and promotes promiscuity.

Date09:04:14, March 29, 2014 CET
FromBeluzian Syndicalist Party
ToDebating the Recognition of Polygamy Act
MessageWe'd have imagined that promiscuity was good for children in that it tends to cause more of them

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 573

no
 

Total Seats: 177

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55