We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forestry Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative and Reformist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3650
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Current: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government discourages tree plantation.
Current: Local governments may set plantation policy.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:42:24, April 12, 2014 CET | From | Luthori Fascist Party | To | Debating the Forestry Bill |
| Message | We prefer devolution on the former issue and on the latter we would support on its own. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes | Total Seats: 151 | |
| no |
Total Seats: 331 | |
| abstain |
Total Seats: 151 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady |