We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: GMO Deregulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konservatīvā Partija
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3662
Description[?]:
No reason to require foods be listed for any GM changes; sure it's important for chemicals and pesticides, but there should not be a stigma attached to GM foods with consumers thinking GM is bad. On the contrary, GM foods are safer, cheaper and yield better for our farmers. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Listing of controversial ingredients, such as genetically modified (GM) ingredients (if food labelling is applied).
Old value:: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Current: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Proposed: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing must be listed. There is no requirement to disclose GM ingredients.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:08:44, May 06, 2014 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the GMO Deregulation |
Message | We agree that GMO foods are perfectly safe, but we support full disclosure so that all of the citizens can make an informed choice. Listing GMO ingredients does not make any claim as to the quality of them, and cannot be reasonably considered to stigmatize them. |
Date | 20:49:09, May 06, 2014 CET | From | Green-Labor Party | To | Debating the GMO Deregulation |
Message | what a bunch of nonsense this is. No! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 46 | |||
no | Total Seats: 149 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 55 |
Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
Random quote: "When was the last time you talked about race with someone of a different race? If the answer is never, you're part of the problem." - Bill Bradley |