We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ban Curfews Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic-Republican Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2164
Description[?]:
| Curfews are a gross violation of the Right of Movement. It helps little in catching criminals, and it's existence is only asking for the rise of a Fascist government in Hutori. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: Local governments may set curfews, but national government does not.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: No curfew policies may be established.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:59:16, December 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Ban Curfews Act |
| Message | We will support this, we have proposed similar in the past. |
| Date | 17:55:26, December 30, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Ban Curfews Act |
| Message | We cant support this because of the crime rate being so high in are nation. However we will accept this once the rate goes down. |
| Date | 20:47:38, January 01, 2006 CET | From | Global Democracy Movement Party | To | Debating the Ban Curfews Act |
| Message | We have to support this, the crime control must be done everyday, starting with the control of the big ones, and everybody know's that this kind of policies are just to protect the top ones. People have the rigth to gather and free speach and free thinking about any subject. This kind of policies are more censureship policies than crime policies. |
| Date | 20:52:03, January 01, 2006 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Ban Curfews Act |
| Message | We already have the ability for groups to asseble, and under this law the local government would decide if its nessacary or not, if its not...they wont have one, if they want one, they will use one. The National government does not take a stance on the issue. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 175 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 115 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 3 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The only people who would be hurt by abandoning the Kyoto Protocol would be several thousand people who make a living attending conferences on global warming." - Kirill Kondratyev |