Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:10:53
Server time: 11:49:06, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): echizen | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: proposal for banks of state

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Solidarity Party (CSP)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3682

Description[?]:

I think it is much safer for the people and the state if they operate the bank.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:48:42, June 13, 2014 CET
FromMouvement Socialiste Rildanorien
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageWe support this proposal!

Date19:24:03, June 13, 2014 CET
FromAlliance des Démocrates
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageNo. Simply no. This is far too interventionist for the AD.

Date20:09:44, June 13, 2014 CET
FromMouvement Socialiste Rildanorien
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageM. Speaker

I'm so sad that this sénat has become a sénat for the rich people! The AD, The GI, the RPR and in fact also the PN are parties who only think about the rich and if a social party wants to vote a bill, they all protect the rich people, because they don't want to give their money to the poor. It's so sad and I hope the voters will see this during the next elections!

Date23:31:59, June 13, 2014 CET
FromAlliance des Démocrates
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageSays the party who opposed tax cuts for the middle-class. If you want a more prosperous people, take less from them! The AD supports taxing the rich at higher rates than the poor. How is this protecting them? Please do tell me! Enlighten us O wise MSR! Jobs and economic growth are fueled by the private sector, not the overly bureaucratic Government. Banks are more efficiently administered by the private sector. It is known.

Date00:09:02, June 14, 2014 CET
FromCommunist Solidarity Party (CSP)
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageWe can't let the private sector do what they want andlet them lead this nation because they dont think about the people. They think only with their wallet! Its time for banks of the state so the state can decide and lead. The profit goes tho the people.

Date06:49:45, June 14, 2014 CET
FromAlliance des Démocrates
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageIt's called regulating the private sector. You can partially control what they do, plus the Government is already taking away just under a quarter of private sector profits. The Government doesn't need to own the banks when it can regulate them...

Date09:29:49, June 14, 2014 CET
FromMouvement Socialiste Rildanorien
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageThe Alliance des Démocrates doesn't have a program. They have no economic program, they only wants to have power, but they cannot govern (and I know it, because I have governed with them). They think they are les Démocrates, but they don't want to support openly a republic of Rildanor. These people are liars!

Date16:09:32, June 14, 2014 CET
FromAlliance des Démocrates
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageI'd like to point out I did vote in favour of establishing a republic. It's just that our party is very cautious when it comes to major changes in Rildanor's constitutional status. Also, our economic program is centrist. The economy needs both sides to function properly; the private sevtor to create jobs and growth and the government to keep the private sector in check and ensure everyone benefits equally from the jobs and prosperity created by our private sector. Are you too blind to see this is what we believe in? Government ownership of banks would make them less competitive, which is bad for consumers. However, the AD completely and whole-heartedly supports regulating them so that consumers can benefit from stability.

Date16:37:28, June 14, 2014 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageA lack of competition among banks can lead to a risk-averse culture that is sure to harm the economy.

Date16:54:10, June 14, 2014 CET
FromAlliance des Démocrates
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageOOC: MSR, a big part of this game is centred on winning elections, so of course I want to win. However, this game favours non-centrist parties, both on the left and on the right... So I maintain no illusion that I would come out first place in an election...

Date13:55:32, June 15, 2014 CET
From Parti Nationaliste 🌞
ToDebating the proposal for banks of state
MessageFor the government to own and control all banks, a big chunk of budget must be alloted to the Finance ministry since all banks will be under its jurisdiction. This is impossible to implement without additional budget increase approved by majority of all members of this Senate.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 21

no
   

Total Seats: 75

abstain
 

Total Seats: 9


Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

Random quote: "You can only progress when you think big, you can only move forward when you look further." - Arria Ivmarus, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72