Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:08:52
Server time: 18:51:07, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): JourneyKan | Mindus | VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the International Agreement on Public Health -- Revised

Details

Submitted by[?]: Mouvement Socialiste Rildanorien

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3683

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the International Agreement on Public Health -- Revised. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:57:25, June 18, 2014 CET
FromMouvement Socialiste Rildanorien
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Public Health -- Revised
MessageWhy does the PC vote against this bill?

Date23:31:25, June 18, 2014 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Public Health -- Revised
MessageOOC: We are generally against treaties because they limit the ability to play the game.

Date19:43:26, June 19, 2014 CET
FromMouvement Socialiste Rildanorien
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Public Health -- Revised
Messageand it's lots more fun when people die because they cannot afford good health care, isn't it PC???

Date01:57:42, June 20, 2014 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the Ratification of the International Agreement on Public Health -- Revised
MessageDon't be so melodramatic. Positive health outcomes can be achieved with or without restrictive treaties.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 63

no
 

Total Seats: 33

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "Soldiers who are not afraid of guns, bombs, capture, torture or death say they are afraid of homosexuals. Clearly we should not be used as soldiers; we should be used as weapons." - Letter to the editor, the Advocate

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 45