We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Social Spending Plan of 2163
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kundrati Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2164
Description[?]:
The Kundrati Socialist Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Kundrati Union. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 1,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 25,000,000,000 KUN |
Foreign Affairs | 50,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 20,000,000,000 KUN |
Internal Affairs | 70,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 65,000,000,000 KUN |
Finance | 60,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 20,000,000,000 KUN |
Defence | 90,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 60,000,000,000 KUN |
Justice | 100,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 60,000,000,000 KUN |
Infrastructure and Transport | 200,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 60,000,000,000 KUN |
Health and Social Services | 500,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 70,000,000,000 KUN |
Education and Culture | 600,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 70,000,000,000 KUN |
Science and Technology | 50,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 65,000,000,000 KUN |
Food and Agriculture | 50,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 60,000,000,000 KUN |
Environment and Tourism | 10,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 60,000,000,000 KUN |
Trade and Industry | 500,000,000,000 KUN | 50,816,000,000 KUN | 40,000,000,000 KUN |
Total | 2,280,001,000,000 KUN | 660,608,000,000 KUN | 675,000,000,000 KUN |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:00:52, December 30, 2005 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | The purpose of this budget was to modernise our spending plans in light of our new tax system. As you can see, funding has been withdrawn from some of the more administrative departments and diverted into social spending and the more practical ministries (technology, policing etc.). Despite the overall spending increase, it also leaves us with a comfortable surplus of around seven billion KUN, in case we want to modify the budget at a later date without a tax hike. |
Date | 15:17:18, December 30, 2005 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | , Hmmm... we feel that Health and Social Services, Education and Culture, and Environment and Tourism are receiving far too much in this proposal, while Defence and Justice could use more. |
Date | 17:23:15, December 30, 2005 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | Ignoring your predictable opposition to social spending, both Defence and Justice got increases of ten billion KUN. We feel that is sufficient. |
Date | 03:46:28, December 31, 2005 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | Any other comments? Secondly, would the PE vote against this in its current form? |
Date | 14:33:09, December 31, 2005 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | Hmmm... no, we'll support it. Might gain us a few brownie points with the rabble. Um, we mean the free people of Kundrati. Yes. Definitely. ;) |
Date | 15:45:32, December 31, 2005 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | :-P Okay. As there have been no other comments, and it's been up for a RL day, we'll move this to a vote. |
Date | 18:14:42, December 31, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | LOL, a budget proposal that cuts basically all funding from the finance ministry! =) =) =) Oh, btw, I don't think budgets influence anything yet. |
Date | 17:05:48, January 01, 2006 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | No, but it's the principle of the matter. |
Date | 17:57:25, January 01, 2006 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | Well, it passed... but did you have to put it to the vote right when it was New Year? |
Date | 21:59:24, January 02, 2006 CET | From | Kundrati Socialist Party | To | Debating the Social Spending Plan of 2163 |
Message | It wouldn't have mattered - had the LibDems and PE been around, it still would have passed. Besides, I don't think you get visibility for budgetary proposals... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 210 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 95 |
Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification. |
Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes |