We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Party Colours Mandate 2163

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Left Communist Party

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2164

Description^[?]:

This bill, in accordance with the Party Identification Act of 2038, calls again for the enforcement of said act on all parties with no modifications.

The PIA (extended) states that "no Party shall share a color found in the Nation's Flag, the nation's map color, or will claim a color which is the same as that of another". This has been violated by the Unchosen and United Blobs parties.

As the PIA is still in effect, this bill calls merely for the increased enforcement of it.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	20:43:15, December 30, 2005 CET
From	Left Communist Party
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	The HPP, CSP, UB and UP all have dark colours that could be indistinguishable on a dark monitor.

Date	22:42:59, December 30, 2005 CET
From	National Imperial Hobrazian Front
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	I think my purple is distinguishable enough.

Date	22:47:21, December 30, 2005 CET
From	National Imperial Hobrazian Front
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	Can't support because UB is green, which is not a color in the Hobrazian flag. However, Unchosen's choice of black violates the PIA.

Date	00:02:29, December 31, 2005 CET
From	We Say So! Party
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	Though we support the PIA, and the Unchosen Party does need to change their colour in order to be in line with said proposal, the other points on UB, CSP and HPP are not necessary and as such we don't support.

Date	00:59:18, December 31, 2005 CET
From	Hobrazian Peoples Party
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	If anyone has a dark monitor they should set the brightness right. I din't thought monitors could affect political party colors. I though agree on unchosen partys colour changing. Should i vote for or against then? I don't believe UB should change colour. could we change that in the description, then it would be okay to vote yes.

Date	03:10:05, December 31, 2005 CET
From	National Imperial Hobrazian Front
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	If one's monitor is so dark that blue, green, purple, and dark red are confused, then I don't understand how they would distinguish much from their monitor anyways.

Date	19:15:36, December 31, 2005 CET
From	Left Communist Party
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	CSP: I understand that the UB is not actually violating the PIA, and did not see that part of the PIA when I stated them as an example. I will resend this bill with that amendment if this loses.

Date	03:41:45, January 01, 2006 CET
From	Liberal-Progressive Union
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	I have no problem making out the party colors, but I though maybe with a dark monitor it would be difficult. Does anyone have problems making out the colors? UB has been green for a while now and asking him to change colors isn't really fair if it's due to one persons dark monitor. I will change my vote for this version of bill

Date	19:42:21, January 02, 2006 CET
From	Left Communist Party
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	The UB and UP parties both look black to me. I'll increase my brightness

Date	19:43:50, January 02, 2006 CET
From	Left Communist Party
To	Debating the Party Colours Mandate 2163
Message	I won't reinstate this bill - indeed there is a difference in colours.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Left Communist Party (45)

Total Seats: 45

Total Seats: 230

abstain

Total Seats: 125

Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

Random quote: "It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66