We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 3697
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3698
Description[?]:
| Stanton House has little to no influence. We need a strong government. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Stanton House
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Communist Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Skeptic Liberal Union
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Communist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Skeptic Liberal Union
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Skeptic Liberal Union
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Communist Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Skeptic Liberal Union
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Communist Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:13:35, July 17, 2014 CET | From | Skeptic Liberal Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 3697 |
| Message | 1. Stanton house has the Grand Consul anyway. 2. There is very little overlap between the Skeptic liberal union and Freedom party. 3. The recent cabinet is not ideal but acceptable (and You have quiet good position in it). |
| Date | 01:23:22, July 18, 2014 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of September 3697 |
| Message | Weak weak weak. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 151 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 599 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "Only the educated are free." - Epictetus |