We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Opinion Poll Vultures
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2053
Description[?]:
| Noting, unfortunately, that is impossible to make this a strictly local issue...we suggest that the regulations imposed on industries be toned down a bit, to encourage increased business investment and establish a more free business system then what currently exists. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Current: Industrial pollution is not regulated by the government.
Proposed: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:36:11, May 15, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | HA! propose this again after you get a thousand gallons of toxic sludge dumped in the empty lot across the street. |
| Date | 04:37:03, May 15, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | 'if they choose to pollute, than that is what they choose to do' if they have the freedom to pollute, then i have the freedom to murder. |
| Date | 05:18:04, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Opinion Poll Vultures | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | Nitrogen is the most common element in the air. If you breath Nitrogen, you die. Yet we're still alive. |
| Date | 05:29:25, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | I agree with the NFP on this one. We have to curb pollution. Otherwise, we will all have to use breath-masks when we walk outside. |
| Date | 05:35:40, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Opinion Poll Vultures | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | Perhaps this is more agreeable? |
| Date | 18:04:20, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Christian Social Union | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | Of course. |
| Date | 20:27:38, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | This is more agreeable, yes. However, I would like to know what is regulated and what won't be. |
| Date | 01:07:11, May 16, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | absolutely not. there's only one planet, and you can only fuck it up once before it's not there anymore. i intend to make that process as slow as possible. and who knows, this might even encourage businesses to develop means of doing things that don't involve making the water undrinkable and the air unbreathable. |
| Date | 02:31:15, May 16, 2005 CET | From | Opinion Poll Vultures | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | The NFP would be kindly asked to keep their tone civil.... ooc: LFTM I don't think there's any way that you can really know what it regulates and what it doesn't...but the way that its worded right now implies to me that it's very opressive |
| Date | 03:54:32, May 16, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | We believe this is suitable for both companies and the environment. While companies now still have to follow guidelines, they can create more jobs, and while the environment will be slightly affected by this, it still won't be as bad as before. |
| Date | 13:06:53, May 16, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | "it still won't be as bad as before." so why not make it not bad at all? |
| Date | 19:12:50, May 16, 2005 CET | From | Opinion Poll Vultures | To | Debating the Government Spending Reform: Industrial Regulation |
| Message | Economic prosperity outweighs what little environmental problems this might cause. We have absolute confidence in the quality of our nations purification facilities, this will not harm anyone. If it does, we volunteer the NFP to test it out for us first. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 166 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 172 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 170 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |