Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 00:59:29
Server time: 07:00:30, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Treaty of the Collective Security and Cooperation Organization

Details

Submitted by[?]: Urban Party of Rutania

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3710

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Treaty of the Collective Security and Cooperation Organization. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:39:14, August 11, 2014 CET
FromThe Steel and the Gray
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty of the Collective Security and Cooperation Organization
MessageMr. Speaker --

While we appreciate the spirit of this treaty which calls for cooperation, the Steel and the Gray does not support giving up our autonomy over military matters to a larger oversight body, nor do we wish to be beholden to a larger body made up of the representatives of three nations for security and military matters.

In particular, we call your attention to Article D, sections II and III: section II would require that Rutania be governed by the will of three "founding nations" of the CSCO; section III would require that Rutania be bound by any action taken by the Security Council.

We do not believe that our military and security concerns must be dictated to by outside forces--if there was an "opt-out" option in Article D (like the one that appears in Article C) then we would support such a treaty. As written, however, we cannot.

Sincerely,
Gen. Fritz Reisen


Date19:47:45, August 11, 2014 CET
FromUrban Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty of the Collective Security and Cooperation Organization
MessageMembers of the Parliament,

Rutania is a regional power in her own right and has engaged in international affairs before both with and without other parties in the process. The fact of the matter is that our country has an opportunity to become a world leader in the foreign policy arena with the passage of this treaty and our military will benefit greatly.

Finally, I question the credentials of Mr. Reisen. Is he a real General in the armed forces or did he purchase said title on the internet? In my view, he has no standing in terms of foreign affairs and is just blowing hot air out of his hind quarters.

Robert Abbott
Minister of Foreign Affairs

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 85

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
           

    Total Seats: 470


    Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats.

    Random quote: "An "acceptable" level of unemployment means that the government economist to whom it is acceptable still has a job." - Author Unknown

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 43