Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5483
Next month in: 00:48:38
Server time: 19:11:21, May 14, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Arusu-Bei | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Liberal - Republican Coalition 3712

Details

Submitted by[?]: People of Freedom (P.F)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3712

Description[?]:

Proposing a Coalition government between the D.A and the Rally For The Republic.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:46:55, August 13, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Liberal - Republican Coalition 3712
MessageMr. Speaker,

The parties in this proposed coalition are inexperienced, and possibly unfit to govern. Additionally, 300 seats are required to pass a cabinet proposal, and they only have 275. Lodamun isn't in an emergency situation where a minority government may be necessary. A more stable coalition, between the GNRG and the P&A, can govern.

--

Gordon Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG

Date09:59:18, August 13, 2014 CET
FromPeople of Freedom (P.F)
ToDebating the Liberal - Republican Coalition 3712
MessageMr Speaker.

As per results of this dissapointing turned out election. The people clearly think we are fully capable of governing. And are slowly getting tired of these to grand old parties.

Phillipa Corazona
D.A Representative on Justice

Date10:10:46, August 13, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Liberal - Republican Coalition 3712
MessageMr. Speaker,

The "grand old parties" still have more seats, and for good reasons.

--

Gordon Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG

Date17:01:46, August 13, 2014 CET
FromRally for the Republic
ToDebating the Liberal - Republican Coalition 3712
MessageMr. Speaker,

We're voting in favor while realizing it will fail. But we find the claims of the GNRG bordering on the laughable. To be clear, they did not governing with anything even remotely looking like a mandate. Indeed, more people voted for the new, more liberal parties than either of the older ones. They did not get more seats "for good reason", they got it through the setup of the electoral system.
Our frustration at the electoral results does not extend to the P and A, and although we wish they had proposed a progressive coalition, it makes sense that they would take advantage of the electoral fluke of the disproportionate national seat share that one party has.
The times, they are a'changing.
XXX
Steven Patrick Morrissey
Parliamentary leader of the Rally For The Republic

Date17:11:12, August 13, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Liberal - Republican Coalition 3712
MessageMr. Speaker,

It is barely a matter of who got more votes. The requirement to pass a cabinet bill is 300 seats.

--

Gordon Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG,
President of Lodamun

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 275

no
  

Total Seats: 324

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364

Random quote: "Political institutions are a superstructure resting on an economic foundation." - Vladimir Lenin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 51