We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Get rid of prostitution bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2053
Description[?]:
| The situation in our country nowadays is disgusting. Yound men and women are selling their bodies in markets all over the country, and the government supports it. Children who see prostitutes getting rich think, "Ooooooh, I wanna be a hooker!" This has to stop. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right for a person to prostitute himself or herself.
Old value:: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Current: Prostitution is legal and a recognized profession.
Proposed: Prostitution is illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:02:11, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Opinion Poll Vultures | To | Debating the Get rid of prostitution bill |
| Message | This is necessary, if our contraception reform is to pass prostitution must be put where it belongs. |
| Date | 17:13:01, May 15, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Get rid of prostitution bill |
| Message | If you want to sell your body, it is your freedom to do so. |
| Date | 18:14:17, May 15, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Get rid of prostitution bill |
| Message | you know what's funny? the same people who defend the mindless violence and abuse of innocent creatures because "it's one of the oldest professions in the world" are against another one of the oldest professions in the world, except that this one does not make use of animal abuse. ...right. |
| Date | 19:45:01, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Get rid of prostitution bill |
| Message | How am I defending mindless violence? Also, I defend hunting because certain parts of the population DEPEND on hunting and fishing. If it weren't for that, I would get rid of it. |
| Date | 23:23:29, May 15, 2005 CET | From | National Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Get rid of prostitution bill |
| Message | "How am I defending mindless violence?" have you even looked at the hunting bill? |
| Date | 23:31:32, May 15, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Get rid of prostitution bill |
| Message | That's not mindless violence. That's letting PEOPLE decide if they want hunting. If everyone is against hunting and fishing as you say, local governments will ban it. However, creating laws that starve portions of the people just because they aren't doing commercial fishing or hunting isn't much better. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 336 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 172 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures. |
| Random quote: "Depressions and mass unemployment are not caused by the free market but by government interference in the economy." - Ludwig von Mises |