We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: End of the nationalised Post Office Monopoly; Creating market competition; Gradually descendent regulation.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Global Democracy Movement Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2166
Description[?]:
| The Post Office's are a vital part of a state, it's a service that should be mantained by the state no doubt about it. The importance of a nationalised post office is vital, for the good function of the nation, but neither the less private ones should not be banned. The right for competition and diffrent market options are crucial for a free and efficient market and economy. In our point of view this fase must be gradual, and at the begining, the private post office's should be regulated, this act of regulation will not avoid the market competition, with will only prevent consertation and other coligation's abuses between private companies, the so call oligopolies, a monopoly managed by more than one company. In the future, we defend that if all keep's in the right way, the private post office's suffer no regulation, but for the now being, regulation must be held gradually, to keep some safety to the consumers. The main idea is that the nationalised post office wont be the only one's to exist, the competition will stimulate the market, and new types of services can be presented to the consumers, this will generate a benefit to the economy. Neither the less, a nationalised post office is allways needed, but market freedom, and competition in economy, are both needed for the evolution of the nation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office agency in the nation. Private ones are banned.
Current: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:17:32, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the End of the nationalised Post Office Monopoly; Creating market competition; Gradually descendent regulation. |
| Message | One of my bills request an entirely privatized Post Office. I cannot, therefore, vote Yes for this, as we feel it would be a backwards step. |
| Date | 15:30:53, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Global Democracy Movement Party | To | Debating the End of the nationalised Post Office Monopoly; Creating market competition; Gradually descendent regulation. |
| Message | No it's not, it's a foward step, step by step is how things should be done, gradual moves, pushing foward to an objective. Being rushed, radical, extremist, only show's lack of rational thinking and mental calcutation. We understand your point, you made a proposition, but we ask you to think again, and do things step by step, better than getting our ideas done, is getting that that idea is understood and backed up not by the majority, but by all possible part's. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 132 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 161 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called 'the People's Stick.'" - Mikhail Bakunin |