We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Pontesi Free Trade Agreement
Details
Submitted by[?]: Friedrich Hayek Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2166
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Pontesi Free Trade Agreement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Pontesi Free Trade Agreement.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:38:48, January 03, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Pontesi Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | Aye! |
| Date | 22:06:17, January 03, 2006 CET | From | SeeYainHell Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Pontesi Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | seems to be all the rage these day' selucian, barmenistanian... |
| Date | 22:06:25, January 03, 2006 CET | From | SeeYainHell Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Pontesi Free Trade Agreement |
| Message | seems to be all the rage these day' selucian, barmenistanian... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 61 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 23 |
| Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
| Random quote: "Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction." - Charles R. Magel |