We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748
Details
Submitted by[?]: People of Freedom (P.F)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3748
Description[?]:
| Proposal. We have found that some areas of our nation agree with polygamy. Wheres as some areas are utterly against it. To balance this out we propose this be left to local governments. Raven Valentinn JDP Deputy Leader |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Current: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Proposed: Local governments establish policies on polygamy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:04:07, October 25, 2014 CET | From | Movement for Percyism | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We can agree with article 2. We ask the JDP to split this bill. Monica Arling Chairwoman CDP |
| Date | 07:30:22, October 25, 2014 CET | From | Federal Liberal Congress | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We can also agree with article two and have the same request as the CDP. Nicola Stubbe Minister of Science and Technology. |
| Date | 07:56:47, October 25, 2014 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr Speaker We have noted the concern and understand these to be very different areas of civil rights. We will comply. Raven Valentinn Minister of Justice |
| Date | 08:24:23, October 25, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, what does this mean? If a Province decides that polygamous marriages are illegal, does it mean that I can't enter that Province? Or does it mean that polygamous marriages will not be solemnized? Paul Murphy-Spaak Jr. LNC chairman |
| Date | 08:41:22, October 25, 2014 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker. Under this law. Mr Murphy Spaak Jr would be able to enter a province that decides to out law polygamy. However Mr Murphy Spaak under the law in those Provinces you would not be able to marry another woman or man whatever the heck you into considering our liberal laws with regards to that area. You would have to go to provinces where polygamy is legal to marry again. Thats it. Raven Valentinn Minister of Justice |
| Date | 11:30:13, October 25, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank Minister Valentinn for this explanation. I just think such things should be explaned in the proposition. I just wanted to know if my two wives and I could enter Provinces that prohibit polygamy. I do not intend to marry another person. Paul Murphy-Spaak Jr. |
| Date | 22:50:20, October 25, 2014 CET | From | Conservative Monarchist Alliance | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We would like to see an end to state endorsement of polygamous marriage, which is unnatural and exploitative. Ignatz Linden Social Affairs spokesman |
| Date | 22:54:12, October 25, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I love both of my wives. It's unnatural to make a person choose between two loves. Polygamy is a great way to prevent adultery. My wives get along very well, as do our children in this polygamous marriage. Paul Murphy-Spaak Jr. LNC chairman proud husband of two fantastic wives |
| Date | 23:11:34, October 25, 2014 CET | From | Conservative Monarchist Alliance | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The Honourable Gentleman is to be congratulated upon his happy home life, but alas, most polygamous families do not enjoy that degree of harmony. Ignatz Linden Social Affairs spokesman |
| Date | 23:16:22, October 25, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, whether or not there are problems with some polygamous families has nothing to do with this. We are a unitarist party and wish to keep the laws on the national level as much as possible. If the Provinces can decide upon this law, the problem stated by Mr. Linden will not change in a bit. Or they would have to start case-to -case studies. This is ridiculous. Paul Murphy-Spaak Jr. |
| Date | 02:50:27, October 26, 2014 CET | From |  Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Polygamous Marriages Amendment Act -3748 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, My party does not believe that a local government should be allowed to ban polygamous unions. -- Gordon Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG, Opposition Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 293 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 291 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
| Random quote: "Democrats couldn't care less if people in Indiana hate them. But if Europeans curl their lips, liberals can't look at themselves in the mirror." - Ann Coulter |