We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: NPH Is Too Stoned To Fight
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free White Castle and The People Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2166
Description[?]:
| No citizens should be compelled to fight in a war against their wishes. Compulsory service results in an economically inefficient military model which favors strategies which cost many lives over strategies which cost expensive equipment. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Proposed: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:21:06, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the NPH Is Too Stoned To Fight |
| Message | No |
| Date | 05:27:55, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the NPH Is Too Stoned To Fight |
| Message | As much as I'm against national service in the form of mandatory military service, I believe we need to keep civilian national service, to improve our country. |
| Date | 18:01:17, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the NPH Is Too Stoned To Fight |
| Message | Wow, the DUP and I stand alone, never thought I would see the day. |
| Date | 18:06:38, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the NPH Is Too Stoned To Fight |
| Message | Not today... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 244 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 506 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "The problem is big government. If whoever controls government can impose his way upon you, you have to fight constantly to prevent the control from being harmful. With small, limited government, it doesn't much matter who controls it, because it can't do you much harm." - Harry Browne |