We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166
Details
Submitted by[?]: RSDP - Democratic Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2166
Description[?]:
| An Act to enable the police to fight child abuse. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Internet regulations.
Old value:: The government has no position on who may use or what is published on the internet.
Current: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Proposed: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:03:33, January 04, 2006 CET | From |  Libertarian Alcoholic Party II | To | Debating the Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166 |
| Message | No discussion? |
| Date | 14:21:43, January 04, 2006 CET | From |  RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166 |
| Message | No, no this time, I'd like to get some bills passed before the next elections. And with the infinite discussions in the bills I have already proposed... |
| Date | 17:32:00, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166 |
| Message | We demand that the internet be kept Free. |
| Date | 18:42:58, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166 |
| Message | By the same logic, you should also demand that the police not be able to collect any information at all. In fact, why not just disband the police and save the money and bother? |
| Date | 21:03:27, January 04, 2006 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166 |
| Message | Indeed, under the current bill the police would not even be able to intervene on the internet! They'd merely have access to it! |
| Date | 09:52:03, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166 |
| Message | " I'd like to get some bills passed before the next elections. And with the infinite discussions in the bills I have already proposed..." What bollocks, the election is not for another three years. Thats plenty of time, you only had to keep it in debate for six months or a year |
| Date | 19:07:53, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166 |
| Message | The RFP merely wishes for the police to be held to the same rules for the internet as it is held to for other means of communication, such as letters. |
| Date | 20:30:38, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Child Abuse Act 2166 |
| Message | Posting something on a messageboard or making a website is not a private act. Sending an email is, and would be subject to the same laws. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 274 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 230 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 95 |
| Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
| Random quote: "I think that gay marriage is something that should be between a man and a woman." - Arnold Schwarzenegger |