We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Deregulation Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Alcoholic Party II
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2167
Description[?]:
Here's something we've been pushing at for quite a while, and its recent appearance in national polls reminded us that ours is currently the most popular stance on this subject. People before animals! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:03:45, January 04, 2006 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Animal Deregulation Bill |
Message | Opposed, obviously, for reasons we consider to be self-evident. There is no reason why we should allow the unregulated use of animals to test cosmetic products. Why should innocent animals suffer because some of us humans want to look better? |
Date | 17:22:07, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Animal Deregulation Bill |
Message | We oppose this as well, testing cosmetic products on animals is cruel and there is no need to do it. |
Date | 18:46:44, January 04, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Animal Deregulation Bill |
Message | Aye. |
Date | 20:36:29, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Party II | To | Debating the Animal Deregulation Bill |
Message | "Why should innocent animals suffer because some of us humans want to look better?" Because humans are more important than animals. Come on - we mutilate animals in thousands every day so we can eat their flesh for pleasure and nutrition. How is keeping them alive for research somehow a greater crime? |
Date | 21:02:49, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Animal Deregulation Bill |
Message | Yeah! Deregulate those animals! |
Date | 21:06:30, January 05, 2006 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Animal Deregulation Bill |
Message | Research? Human vanity is a more appropriate description. |
Date | 21:57:11, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Animal Deregulation Bill |
Message | Who cares? It all contributes to the economy. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 272 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 298 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 29 |
Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "The great masses of the people... will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one." - Adolf Hitler |