We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Symbol
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party of Love and Flowers
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3765
Description[?]:
MY party believe the Religious Symbol ban is extreme and not realist, what are we going to define as religious symbol or not we certainly agree that religion has no place in the state, but we believe that one should be able to wear little crucifix, My party will still respect the law voted for presidium as we have no intention break laws if our are defeated. Surely a ban of all religion is a bit too extreme, we quite agree that religion can be dangerous to human as over history religious state has already tried to impose the view of a few minds over the vast majority, but that is the majority Myriam Mitchell , EPLLCP spokewoman on freedom. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Wearing religious clothing or religious symbols in public is illegal.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:58:29, November 26, 2014 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Religious Symbol |
Message | Mr. Speaker, in case of voting, RPF will abstain. Current and proposed law are bad. Government shouldn't ban freedom of religious. Jack Gallagher, Leader of RPF |
Date | 04:52:14, November 26, 2014 CET | From | Party of Love and Flowers | To | Debating the Religious Symbol |
Message | Mr speaker. we feel that when one state, one cannot represent a religion or political party. Myriam Mithcell |
Date | 05:08:07, November 26, 2014 CET | From | Social Libermuns Party | To | Debating the Religious Symbol |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Absolutely not! I will fight you on this. Mark my words, Hosian. ~ Rowan Argall The President |
Date | 08:37:14, November 26, 2014 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Religious Symbol |
Message | Mr. Speaker, no religions are allowed, so there is no room for religious symbols neither. Not for politicians but for everyone! Little John Murphy-Spaak vice-President of Lodamun |
Date | 17:58:10, November 26, 2014 CET | From | Party of Love and Flowers | To | Debating the Religious Symbol |
Message | Mr. Speaker this does not come from hosians.. this come from the lodamese nationalist branche of our party. Myriam Mitchell |
Date | 22:40:52, November 26, 2014 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Religious Symbol |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Myriam Mitchell is lying. A Lodamese Nationalist would not propose this. If religion is legal, Nationalists would fight against it by posing Nationalism itself as a religion as well, and using Nationalism to guide the state. They keep Nationalism and the state intertwined. Where religion is banned, Nationalists are pleased that religions aren't in society at all, and see this bill as unnecessary since religion is already banned. -- Andre Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG, Vice President of Lodamun |
Date | 22:39:44, November 27, 2014 CET | From | Party of Love and Flowers | To | Debating the Religious Symbol |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Banning religion won't make it disappear, you live in illusions. Myriam Mitchell. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 314 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 285 |
Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
Random quote: "You don't have to buy from anyone. You don't have to work at any particular job. You don't have to participate in any given relationship. You can choose." - Harry Browne |